President Trump wants to do away with required quarterly earnings reports for public companies, saying they should only have to report results twice a year. It might not be that simple.
Investors are likely to put up a fight. Institutional investors such as pension funds and hedge funds typically crave more information on the companies they follow, not less. In other countries where regulators removed quarterly reporting requirements, many companies still report more frequently.
A Securities and Exchange Commission spokeswoman said Monday the agency and its chairman, Paul Atkins, are now prioritizing the issue at Trump’s request, suggesting it has momentum. Such a change would support the Trump administration’s goal of reducing regulation.
“I can’t recall an investor ever saying we should share less,” Marc Suidan, chief financial officer at cloud-storage company Backblaze, told me. “Usually they’re asking me to share a lot more.”
The potential change would mean giving out guidance for six months out instead of three months, Suidan said. That would introduce more variability in the financial results for Backblaze, whose earnings are typically predictable on a quarterly basis but not longer than that, he said.
✏️ Share your thoughts: Should public companies make financial reports twice a year rather than quarterly? Why or why not? Join the conversation below or at the end of our story.
|