|
Good day. Venture investors like to say they are sticking to their strategy fund after fund. Slava Rubin and Cyrus Massoumi, however, saw their first fund more as an experiment. What they learned led to an evolution of their strategy.
The founders of Miami venture firm Humbition switched things up for their $45 million second fund. With this pool, which held a final close in January, they are writing very early checks into artificial-intelligence and deeptech startups around the country and the world, Rubin said.
That’s quite different from their generalist $30 million debut fund launched in 2018 that focused on New York deals, Rubin said.
Prior to Humbition, Rubin co-founded crowdfunding platform Indiegogo, while Massoumi co-founded online doctor-appointments service Zocdoc. They were also active angel investors.
Humbition 2 has backed nine portfolio companies thus far, including defense-tech startups Wild West Systems and Uforce and Bonus Health, a provider of voice-based healthcare services.
We spoke with Rubin about the deeptech market and why Humbition has changed its approach. Responses have been edited for length and clarity.
WSJ Pro: You were focused on New York at first. Why did you broaden that out?
Rubin: We thought that having a physical focus would cut through the noise and be better for our messaging for both LPs and entrepreneurs and at first we followed that. The more we did it, the more we realized this isn’t what’s important. What’s important is having unique access to these entrepreneurs. I’m still bullish on New York.
WSJ Pro: Why did you dive into deeptech?
Rubin: We saw the evolution even in our Fund I of robotics and AI companies. We love finding that mad scientist type, some really complicated technology that can be differentiated. So Fund II is really [about] us doubling down on what worked best in Fund I and our angel portfolio.
AI is collapsing development timelines across robotics, defense, space and healthcare infrastructure. What used to take $50 million to build now takes $5 million. The combination of cheaper infrastructure and real demand is making deeptech investable at early stages in a way it just wasn't 10 years ago.
WSJ Pro: How do you deal with the capital-intensity risk in deeptech?
Rubin: We try to get in super early when it’s all about team and dream, and hopefully it’s not too expensive. Deeptech can indeed be capital-intensive, but it should not be capital-inefficient. Every round needs to de-risk something specific—technical validation, commercial demand, regulatory progress, manufacturing or partnerships.
|