|
Good day. Day one of the RSAC Conference in San Francisco, of course, dominated by artificial intelligence. This year, however, and whisper it quietly, there seems to be a more pragmatic appreciation of what AI is actually doing to cyber defense.
There’s a general sense that the conversation is moving beyond the excitement and somewhat starry-eyed (if those eyes belong to vendor salespeople) optimism and into the practicalities of a world where AI is very much a dual-use technology. Yes, it’s beneficial for defenders, but also attackers.
That means some oft-cited reassurances from AI prophets of the past about humans always in the loop may not be, well, true.
“You have to fight AI with AI,” Francis deSouza, chief operating officer and president of security products at Google Cloud, told me on a panel I moderated Monday. The speed of the attacks coming from adversarial agents, he said, means that humans simply won’t be able to respond to them in the near future.
Others put it more starkly.
“Having a human in the loop isn’t scalable,” said Emma Smith, global CISO at British telecom company Vodafone.
The conversation seems to be shifting from whether humans should manage the machines to whether humans should be involved at all in agentic defense, beyond oversight roles.
More from me on what I’ve heard around the Moscone Center below, plus other news.
|