I hesitate to write about “quiet quitting” because, in a matter of weeks, the phrase has cruised well into overexposure territory. But I feel almost compelled to share that it’s possible for employees to sustain a happy medium between burnout-induced slacking and the live-to-work drive that is ingrained as part of Corporate America.
To quickly summarize, quiet quitting as a concept started when some employers and managers noticed that workers had extensive personal or professional priorities outside of work and weren’t exceeding expectations with their actual workload.
The terminology doesn’t make sense to me as the phenomenon is neither “quiet” nor “quitting.” It isn’t “quiet” because workers aren’t being sneaky about these other priorities. And it isn’t “quitting” because workers are still showing up to work and meeting expectations, even if their performances aren’t always blowing managers away.
According to 2021 statistics from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, a U.S. employee works an average of 1,791 hours a year. This is 442 more hours than the average worker in Germany, 294 more than the worker in the U.K. and 184 more than the worker in Japan. And while the government has reported that U.S. labor productivity has declined this year, there could be many reasons for this—such as Covid-19-related absences and team shake-ups due to resignations.
I asked a few leaders what they thought of all this, starting with Laura Baldwin, the president of O’Reilly Media Inc., a provider of online and virtual training in technology and business.
“Quiet quitting is more about an employee setting boundaries than trying to coast by with little to no effort,” Ms. Baldwin said. Employees are taking more control of a financial system that has long rewarded company growth at all costs, she said, and it’s a continuation of workers speaking up for themselves and setting boundaries that began during the pandemic.
Piyush Mehta, the chief human resources officer of Genpact, a professional services firm with 100,000 employees in more than 30 countries, believes that quiet quitting is simply a way individuals renegotiate their own sense of balance.
“I can see how it’s raising people’s awareness about how they feel about their work and perhaps prodding them to ask themselves if their jobs are fulfilling or not,” Mr. Mehta said. “And if that leads to employees taking steps to evolve their roles within their current organization or update their skills, I see that as a good thing.”
While the quiet-quitting trend is nothing to be alarmed about, here are three things leaders can do to ensure the most effective employee support:
-
Temper expectations. As Ms. Baldwin said, it isn’t 100% on the employee to manage the tension between their personal priorities and the culture of workaholism. Leaders need to take responsibility for matching organizational culture to the realities of today’s world, and understand that employees no longer want to work around the clock. And, an employee may not have your track record of smashing every key performance indicator that comes their way, and that has to be OK.
-
Respect that learning needs to happen on company time. It’s one thing to give employees learning and development opportunities, but it’s another to work people so hard they don’t have the energy to take advantage of those opportunities. “Your people need to have the space and time to invest in building new skills,” Ms. Baldwin said.
-
Be on the lookout for actual disengagement and burnout. Sometimes quiet quitting means assertive balance, and at other times it could be a sign of underlying issues. A company can solve for an employee’s active disengagement and resentment with a personalized, engaging and responsive employee experience, including real-time employee sentiment checks and behavioral-health support tools.
For instance, Genpact’s digital chatbot, Amber, reaches out to employees to capture their immediate concerns and make empathic suggestions for managing their work/life balance. Genpact is seeing an impressive two-times attrition difference between employees who engage with Amber chats versus those who don’t.
|