No Images? Click here 14 NOVEMBER 2018Blue tide risingThe midterms may have been a week ago today, but three key results remain in play - depending on who you ask. It now appears the Democrats will win at least 35 seats in the House of Representatives, much more than the 27 projected on election night, and lose one or two fewer Senate
seats than predicted. In response to the changing face of the results, CNN even aired an 'Election Night in America Continued' special in the United States on Tuesday. Despite an historic turnout for a midterm election cycle, accusations of voter fraud on the left and voter suppression on the right have led to competing claims that both sides of politics are responsible for eroding the American democratic tradition. NEWS WRAPMake Europe Great Again
![]() “I am replacing my words of concession with an uncompromised and unapologetic call that we count every single vote.” Andrew Gillum ![]() ANALYSISFoolish to rule out a Trump 2020 victorySimon Jackman Above all, these midterm elections were a reaffirmation of American democracy. A signal contrary to much commentary, that neither Trump — nor the Russians, the Chinese, nor the Internet nor Fox News — are destroying American democratic institutions. To be sure, American election administration is an embarrassment, a deplorable cacophony of state and local variation in professional, incompetence, resourcing and partisan chicanery. The Florida recount promises to be spectacularly unedifying. The turnout surge — or the smaller, midterm turnout slump — was not all due to Democrats. The Kavanagh Supreme Court confirmation was the change point, seized upon by Trump and the party. Trump injected himself into the campaign in the closing weeks — drawing on the fact he enjoys a near 90 per cent approval rating among Republican identifiers — talking up immigration and border security, going so far as to mobilise the US military to defend the Mexican border. It all worked. Republican voters reported being as enthusiastic and engaged as Democrats by the end of the campaign. America returns to divided government. Like Bill Clinton in 1994 and Obama in 2010, Trump now has a hostile House of Representatives. Legislating the Trump agenda is essentially no more. Executive action — always a more comfortable route for Trump — becomes all the more important. Compromises with the Democrats seem fantastic to contemplate, but trading Democratic support for continued large defence budgets for an infrastructure package — and surrender on repealing Obamacare — might be one place to look. Democratic-controlled House committees will rain subpoenas on the White House, and a live question is whether Democratic leader Pelosi (or her successor) can hold off calls from her caucus for impeachment proceedings. Democrats will likely support Trump's toughness with respect to China, with concerns over human rights added to trade, IP and security issues. Trump's "ownership" of the Republican Party – his ability to mobilise the Republican base – is one of the big takeaways. Absent some devastating revelation from the Mueller investigation, or an abrupt downturn in the economy, Trump will almost surely be renominated by his party in 2020, should he seek a second term. Democrats performed well in several states that Trump won in 2016: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, North Carolina and Kansas returned state-wide majorities for Democrats in either House votes, Senate votes, governor's races, or all three. Yet two large, swing states — Ohio and Florida — appear, for now, to have withstood the blue tide. The 2020 implications are elusive – much will depend on who the Democrats nominate – but it would be foolish to point at these results and Trump's approval rating and predict he won't or can't win in 2020. DIARYThe week ahead
![]() EVENTUS and Australian strategy in the Indo-PacificAustralia’s Shadow Minister for Defence, the Hon Richard Marles MP, will deliver a public address on the role of the US-Australia alliance in an increasingly complex Indo-Pacific region. He will explore the enduring significance of the ANZUS alliance and bilateral defence relationship, as well as the implications of Washington’s National Defense Strategy and National Security Strategy for Australia’s own backyard and strategic policy choices. The minister will elaborate on his analysis, 'The Nuclear Weapons Prohibition Treaty, National Security and ANZUS' during his public speech. DATE & TIME LOCATION COST Manage your email preferences | Forward this email to a friend United States Studies Centre |