No images? Click here 4 NOVEMBERElection Day message from SimonA flurry of polls in the home stretch and an update of the exercise I (and many others) have been conducting for months now: an examination of 2020 poll averages under a “poll error like 2016” scenario. States where the split between the two candidates is smaller than the polling error from 2016 will likely decide this election. In descending order of Electoral Votes, these include:
No matter where you are on the politics, I know we all hope for a fair, free and above all peaceful Election Day and days following. Professor Simon Jackman VIDEOMedia and the 2020 electionDid you miss our recent webinar on Media and the 2020 election? For this instalment of our Election Watch series, the USSC hosted an all-media panel featuring The Australian's Cameron Stewart, The Australian Financial Review's Jacob Greber, Matthew Knott from The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald and host Zoe Daniel. Watch the full discussion HERE. Catch this and other recent webinars on the USSC YouTube channel! ![]() NEWS WRAPPolling's moment of truth
![]() What I am wondering is if this will be one or the rarest species of national elections—a wave election in a presidential year ending in a zero, meaning it will reverberate for a decade thanks to the coming redistricting. Charlie Cook ANALYSISFree and fair? American attitudes towards electoral integrity and legitimacyProfessor Simon Jackman Dr Shaun Ratcliff How fair do Americans believe their elections are? Do they think votes are counted properly, or that fraudulent mail-in ballots are cast? Will Americans accept the election outcome if their candidate loses? There are some concerning signs that many US citizens have reservations about electoral integrity and no longer accept the legitimacy of candidates other than their own. Since the 1970s, ideological polarisation has increased, widening the gap between the policy preferences of Republicans and Democrats. Since the winner can pass legislation, appoint judges to federal courts, and make executive orders as polarisation increases, the consequences of winning or losing a presidential election are significant. This was highlighted by the blocking of Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nomination, moderate liberal Merrick Garland, by the Republican Senate majority nine months before the 2016 presidential election, and the appointment and confirmation of conservative Amy Coney Barrett by Republican President Donald Trump and the Republican Senate majority a week before the 2020 election. Polarisation makes it difficult for Democrats and Republicans to negotiate, undermining governance through gridlock and lower quality legislation and limiting the ability of the executive and judicial branches to properly function. Affective polarisation (the tendency of Republicans and Democrats to view supporters of the other party negatively, and co-partisans positively) is also increasing. This impacts on voters' willingness to accept the legitimacy of the other side and elections won by their opponents. Perceptions of poor electoral integrity and disputes about the legitimacy of the winner could create significant issues after the election. Law enforcement officials are bracing for problems after the election, with some groups ready for violence if the results do not go their way; although some research suggests widespread outbreaks of violence are unlikely. To better understand Americans beliefs about how free and fair their electoral process is, and how the results of the 2020 presidential election will be received, the United States Studies Centre at the University of Sydney surveyed 1,500 Americans in early October 2020. This is an excerpt from the Centre's latest State of the United States polling BY THE NUMBERSAcceptance of opposition winRep 45% | Dem 31% USSC polling experts Professor Simon Jackman and Dr Shaun Ratcliff conducted a poll between 13-19 October. The poll asked respondents who were voting for Donald Trump to agree or disagree with the following statement: ‘If the Democratic candidate Joe Biden wins the presidential election in November, all Americans should accept him as the president.’ Only 45 per cent agreed or strongly agreed with the proposition. The poll asked supporters of Joe Biden to agree or disagree with the following statement: ‘If the Republican candidate Donald Trump wins the presidential election in November, all Americans should accept him as the president’. Even fewer, 31 per cent, agreed or strongly agreed. We asked all other respondents: ‘No matter who wins the presidential election in November, all Americans should accept him as the president.’ A slim majority, 58 per cent, agreed or strongly agreed. To read more results from the State of the United States Poll, click HERE. VIRTUAL EVENTUS POLITICS WEB SERIESWith special guests former US Ambassador to Australia Jeff Bleich and former Australian Consul-General Chelsey MartinThe Perth USAsia Centre and United States Studies Centre host a monthly web series in which our CEOs review the latest in US politics with a focus on the US election and US-Indo-Pacific relations. This month's distinguished guests are Jeff Bleich, former US Ambassador to Australia and Chelsey Martin, former Australian Consul-General in Los Angeles who will discuss the US election results with USSC CEO Simon Jackman and Perth USAC CEO Gordon Flake. WHEN: Manage your email preferences | Forward this email to a friend United States Studies Centre ![]() |