No Images? Click here 1 MAYMueller objected to attorney-general's summary of Russia investigationSpecial Counsel Robert Mueller wrote a letter complaining to US Attorney-General William Barr that the summary of the Mueller report that he prepared for Congress “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of Mueller’s work. The letter, which was obtained by The Washington Post, was sent on March 27, after Barr had announced that Mueller had not found a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian officials seeking to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. Barr also said Mueller had not reached a conclusion about whether Trump had tried to obstruct justice, but Barr reviewed the evidence and found it insufficient to support such a charge. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations,” Mueller wrote in his letter. ![]() NEWS WRAPGo Midwest
![]() The longer this continues, the greater the chances that measles will again get a foothold in the United States. US Centers for Disease Control Director for Immunisation Dr Nancy Messonnier ![]() ANALYSISAustralia and US education policy and the role of parental involvementKailee Atkinson The United States and Australia both fall in the lower middle tier of the world’s developed countries for education quality. There are a variety of factors that significantly influence the educational experience of children: funding, access to technology, class size and the level of teacher’s education are just a few. Studies show that parental involvement also plays a crucial role in a student’s success. Unfortunately, the United States has yet to create an effective educational policy that emphasises and encourages parental involvement from within the school and community. Despite Australia’s rankings, it is beginning to see positive educational trends that will affect it moving forward. Current Australian education policy can serve as a model for future US policy. A 2018 US Census Bureau report found a strong correlation between parental involvement and student development. Children perform better in school when they come from a household that is able to provide economic, cultural, and human resources that inspire and motivate them outside of the classroom. Parents who earn lower wages typically work longer hours, leaving less time for reading with their children. Varying parental involvement creates obvious difficulty for policy makers to pinpoint what changes to prioritise. Current policy in the United States has jostled between working with schools and directly with communities to overcome the consequences of incongruous levels of parental involvement. These efforts have made minimal discernible impact. In 2010, the United States Department of Education awarded 21 communities funding allocated towards education centres, school programs, and community centers. The primary goal was to provide low-income parents with more opportunities to become involved in their children’s academics to boost performance. The continuation of this expensive program was contingent to funding availability, thus since 2011 it has not been awarded any grants. Regardless, the true success of the program itself can be deemed once the first cohort of students pass through in 2020. In 2015, President Obama signed the Every Student Succeeds Act, which protects low socioeconomic status (SES) students by giving states the freedom to treat schools and districts individually rather than as one. New Mexico has been praised for its comprehensive plans to use community and parental involvement that focuses on the individual needs of struggling schools to increase state-wide graduation rate by 14 per cent by 2022. Solutions ranged from building stronger parent-student-teacher relations programs to implementing more technical education programs to boost graduation rates. Australian education policy has done better to encourage parental involvement for greater student success. From 2009 to 2014 Australia’s National Partnership Agreement on Low Socio-Economic Status School Communities worked to boost student engagement and performance through reform of school structure and community-centred funding that catered towards parental inclusion. Between 2009 and 2013, National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) scores increased, on average, by 1.79 points for spelling and 3.64 points for grammar and punctuation in participating low SES students. Australia’s rise in NAPLAN scores exemplifies the positive impact of effective parental involvement encouraged by schools. Further, the Parent Engagement Project (PEP) commissioned by the Australian Government Department of Education and Training from 2014-2018 sought to encourage understanding of parent engagement. This project focused on the education of parents through their children’s schools on the fundamental importance of reading to young children. Between 2008 and 2015 the percentage of Aboriginal parents that read at least one book or told at least one story per week to a 0-2 aged child rose from 67.2 per cent to 70.3 per cent nationally due to PEP. Studies indicate that these children are significantly more likely to become excited about learning. Results like this identify an important strategy in prompting parental involvement, as some parents may not understand the magnitude of these early steps in the learning process. Statistics show that the implementation of programs like PEP and funding centred around parental involvement in Australia have improved student success rates. If the United States was to approach student success in a similar manner, perhaps by creating government funded parental education programs - specifically in lower income communities - similar results would no doubt follow. DIARYThe week ahead
![]() EVENTFilm screening | The Manchurian Candidate (1962)A presidential election campaign, an attempt by Russians to get a sleeper agent in the White House, the US government on the brink of being subverted and taken over by foreign interests – sound familiar? It's hard to believe The Manchurian Candidate was released in 1962, but 2019 seems like as good a time as any to revisit the Academy Award-nominated film starring Frank Sinatra, Laurence Harvey, Angela Lansbury and Janet Leigh. The suspense thriller was filmed at the the height of US-Soviet hostility during the Cuban Missile Crisis. It was selected in 1994 for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant". Non-Resident Senior Fellow Stephen Loosley AM (whose expertise combines presidential politics and Hollywood history) will host an audience discussion following the film. Ticket includes the film, discussion and refreshments. DATE & TIME LOCATION COST Manage your email preferences | Forward this email to a friend United States Studies Centre |