No images? Click here 29 JANUARYPeace in our time?President Trump has released his administration's plan for peace between Israel and Palestine. The 181-page proposal, which the president's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, is said to have been working on for three years, would see Israel gaining control of a unified Jerusalem and sovereignty over the Jordan Valley and its internationally disputed settlements in the West Bank while Palestinians would get more than double the amount of territory they currently control. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu indicated that Israel would observe a 4-year freeze on settlement expansion during negotiations over a Palestinian state. But as President Trump and Netanyahu announced the plan, Palestinian representation was noticeably absent. Diplomatic communication was cut with the United States following the relocation of its embassy in Israel to Jerusalem in 2018. The plan was met incredulously by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas who said "After the nonsense that we heard today, we say a thousand no’s to the Deal of The Century.” READ MORE HERE. NEWS WRAPAnother Bolton bombshell
![]() It’s increasingly likely that other Republicans will join those of us who think we should hear from John Bolton. I’ve spoken with others who’ve opined upon this as well. Republican Senator Mitt Romney of Utah ![]() ANALYSISLittle green army men: Renewable energy and the DoDHarris
Wohl Throughout his campaign and presidency, President Trump has vowed to save the coal sector from a demise that seems to be inching closer every year. Economic considerations, however, have diverged from the president’s agenda. On average, costs to generate energy from wind have fallen 69 per cent since 2009, and solar generation costs have decreased by 88 per cent. During the same time period, the cost of coal generation has stayed relatively stagnant and only fallen 8 per cent. A decade ago, switching to renewable energy usually meant taking a financial hit in order to make a political statement. But today, governments, businesses, and homes are switching to renewables purely as a cost-cutting measure. The Pentagon appears to be no exception to this. As an organisation that spent $3.5 billion in 2017 to provide electricity to its bases and facilities, the Department of Defense (DoD) is open to cost-cutting measures notwithstanding the political implications. The US military budget is already overstretched with lofty goals in the Indo-Pacific and costly engagements in the Middle East. The success of these engagements is partially hampered by the high costs of providing electricity to military installations. In the 2010 National Defense Authorization Act, DoD was tasked with producing 25 per cent of its total facility energy use from renewable sources by 2025. As of 2018, they were on track to meet this goal, producing 15.76 per cent from renewables. This success is due, in part, to bases like Fort Hood in semi-arid Texas. Fort Hood was a prime location to test the effectiveness of large-scale solar production on the site of one of the largest military installations in the country. By 2017, Fort Hood was home to 63,000 solar panels, as well as 21 off-base wind turbines. The Army estimates the transition to renewable energy will end up saving the base over $100 million over the next thirty years. Further investment across DoD could save billions in the long-term. Energy companies are already partnering with the federal government in this area. SunPower will have installed 100 megawatts of solar power at 33 federal government sites within the next few years while Southern Company has already installed 400 megawatts of solar at 14 military installations, with eight more on the way. As the military continues to work with the private sector to build renewable sources into its energy supply, these industries scale so that solar and wind become cheaper to produce, lowering costs for consumers and businesses throughout the country. Beyond cost-cutting, the Pentagon is also concerned with energy resilience, or maintaining operations during events that disrupt the supply of energy. In 2017, DoD reported 1,205 utility outages that lasted eight hours or longer. More often than not, an outage like this meant relying on aging diesel backup generators to power everything from hospitals to mission-critical command and control centres. Bases currently rely on commercial grids and are located in remote areas. These military installations could become more resilient by adopting on-site renewable energy infrastructure. But implementing on-site renewable energy infrastructure still has challenges. Without energy storage, large-scale renewable projects would be unable to supply energy to a base in the event of an outage. Bases would need storage mechanisms like lithium-ion batteries. DoD has already experimented with microgrids, which are a mechanism that allows a base to operate as a closed system, consuming energy produced on-site without first sending it to the commercial grid but it is still early days. As important as cost-saving is, further investment – particularly in microgrid technologies or storage mechanisms – is imperative if the Department of Defense hopes to reap the full benefits of renewable energy sources. ![]() EVENT2020 Vision: What to expect from the United States this yearOne year from this month, a newly elected president will take office in Washington, DC. The long and intense competition leading to that day begins on 3 February 2020, with the Iowa Caucuses, the first nominating contest in the Democratic Party’s primaries for the 2020 presidential election. What are Trump’s chances of re-election? Which Democratic challenger is likely to be Trump’s opponent in November? What impact will renewed tensions in the Middle East have on the election, and what are the implications for Australia? And what will be the trajectory of rivalry between China and the United States in this election year? To hear more on these issues, please join us for the first in a series of public events on the 2020 US presidential election by the US Studies Centre. The panel will feature analysis by USSC experts:
DATE & TIME LOCATION COST Manage your email preferences | Forward this email to a friend United States Studies Centre ![]() |