Everything that Charities Services does – registering charities, keeping the Charities Register up to date, and looking into possible wrongdoing – is so the public can be confident that their donations are being used to make a positive difference, and that New Zealand charities really are “charitable”.
One of the ways that we give confidence to the public is by following up on complaints, media reports and information about charities.
What would prompt us to open an investigation?
We don’t open an investigation in every case.
We have a team of investigators who are experienced in charities law and in investigation techniques, who “triage” the initial evidence, and decide whether further enquiry is needed.
The team generally looks into charities where there is significant wrongdoing that could potentially cause the most harm to the sector and the public. “Wrongdoing” includes fraud, misappropriation of funds, using a charity for private benefit, gross mismanagement, financial negligence, and oppressive or discriminatory behaviour.
When the team decides to open an investigation, it gathers all the information it needs to assess whether the charity might be in breach of the Charities Act. All our investigations are necessarily thorough, and may involve a wide range of people and organisations.
What happens after an investigation?
An investigation can result in a number of different outcomes. In some cases, charities ask to be deregistered while they are still being investigated.
In some cases, the team finds that it needs to direct the charity to fix governance or financial management issues that are causing problems. In this type of case, the charity generally continues to operate, but we may continue to monitor it for a period of time.
Sometimes, the team finds evidence of problems that are so serious they need to consider deregistering the charity, banning its officers from being an officer of a registered charity, and/or involving other government agencies such as Inland Revenue, the Serious Fraud Office, or the Police. Deregistration can have significant flow-on effects for the charity’s tax liability and ability to attract funding.
We can also issue a statutory warning notice.
Hammond Rees, Charities Services’ investigations manager, says that “Charities in New Zealand generally have a good reputation, but those that do engage in wrongdoing can cause significant harm and damage the public’s trust. That’s why we treat seriously any complaint about a charity.”
Here are two examples of recent investigations, and their outcomes:
Ranui Boys Incorporated - CC31289
Year registered:
2008
Charitable purpose:
To provide early childhood education in the Auckland area
Why did we open an investigation?
Charities Services became concerned after we received information from another government agency that led us to believe that serious wrongdoing might be involved.
What did our investigation find?
Our investigation found that the charity had been taken over by an individual who had dishonesty convictions, which is a breach of the Charities Act. Charities Services allege that the person had misappropriated tens of thousands of dollars from the charity by making cash withdrawals from the charity’s bank account and transferring the funds to their own personal bank account. The charity’s funds were found to have been used at casinos, for a personal business venture, and for other non-charitable purposes.
The charity was also significantly mismanaged by its officers and had poor record keeping, sub-standard financial oversight, and didn’t hold sufficient board meetings. It also allowed charity funds to be used to provide personal benefits to its officers and their families.
What was the outcome of our investigation?
The charity has been deregistered for serious wrongdoing, and Charities Services is liaising with the NZ Police.
Southern Cross Charitable Trust - CC24144
Year registered:
2008
Charitable purpose:
To provide support, training and education to young people in New Zealand.
Why did we open an investigation?
Charities Services became concerned after we received information from another government agency that led us to believe that serious wrongdoing might be involved. We were told there had been a large number of claims from related entities, for donor tax credits relating to the Trust.
What did our investigation find?
Our investigation found that the charity was at the centre of a large number of circular transactions (loans and donations) that provided benefit to related entities, and that only a very small proportion of the charity’s funds had ever been used for any genuinely charitable purposes.
The loans were made at below market rates to entities linked to the officer of the charity. It appears that around $6.5m of charitable funds were wrongly used for non-charitable purposes, and the potential benefit of this money has been lost from the charitable sector.
Evidence showed that the financial management of the charity was grossly negligent and exhibited gross mismanagement. We also found that the charity had an independent, non-charitable purpose of providing private pecuniary profit to its officers.
What was the outcome of our investigation?
The charity has been deregistered for serious wrongdoing.