No images? Click here ![]() 27 MAYPompeo, protests, and power dynamicsIt is not normal for a US Secretary of State to appear on Sky News but – as Phil Rucker from the Washington Post pointed out at our Tuesday webinar – it is not normal for a Secretary of State to travel to Iowa either. Secretary Pompeo’s comments on the Victorian Government’s involvement with China's Belt and Road Initiative prompted a swift clarification from the US Ambassador to Australia, Arthur B. Culvahouse Jr., emphasising the strong US-Australian alignment through the Five Eyes intelligence sharing alliance. The theoretical potential for economic seduction from a single Australian state participating in the Belt and Road Initiative will likely remain a smaller risk than the non-theoretical economic coercion Beijing appears to be conducting through threats to Australian beef, barley and higher education. These tensions in the Australia-China-US relationship are what the United States Studies Centre will be exploring in depth in our webinar on Thursday. At the same time as Australia is being squeezed by China and nudged by a senior US official, activist pressure has been boiling over in the United States. The anti-lockdown protests may be more astroturf than grassroots, activism pushed from the top down. In this issue of the 45th, we look at at how all of these different power dynamics are playing out in the United States and what it means for Australia. ![]() NEWS WRAPA not-so-simple disconnect
![]() I just want to make something clear, it's very important. Vaccine or no vaccine, we're back. And we're starting a process. President Donald Trump ![]() ANALYSISTrump sees political opportunity in protests against enemiesElliott Brennan On the 17th of April, President Donald Trump issued a series of calls on Twitter to “LIBERATE” Michigan, Minnesota and Virginia. Within three days, the number of protests in the country had doubled and nearly 100,000 more Americans had tested positive for coronavirus. New research from the United States Studies Centre using the Global Database of Emotion, Language and Tone, shows that despite the United States having one of the fastest rates of infection in the world in April, the five day rolling average of protests in the country spiked to a level higher than that reached at any time during 2019, the so-called ‘Year of Global Protest’. The vast majority of the increase in protests from March to April were in opposition to state enforced lockdowns and stay-at-home orders. While the protests spiked after President Trump’s interventions, it is clear that he did not cause the anti-lockdown movement himself. Protests in the United States were already rising rapidly when he weighed in. This is a common trend not just from the Trump administration, but more generally from the president’s life. The birther conspiracy theory, OBAMAGATE and even the debunked Joe Scarborough murder conspiracy theory all bear the hallmarks of this ability to identify grievances involving his political enemies, and to amplify them. Even though the gatherings have been smaller than those in 2019, protesting at this time is a dangerous political act. After 1,500 people attended a rally in Madison, Wisconsin, in late April more than 70 people tested positive for the virus who indicated to health officials that they had “attended a large event”. As the larger of these actions have centred on state capitols, anonymous cell phone data has shown that protesters have often travelled hundreds of miles and even across state lines to attend, before returning home. For some of these protesters, home can be more rural parts of the United States which often lack the necessary health infrastructure to deal with any outbreak, let alone one as aggressive as the novel coronavirus. The increase in the number of individual protest events, however small the gatherings and especially considering the health risks, is significant. For all these reasons it’s hard to imagine any other American president in recent memory seeing an uptick in civil resistance that involved the flouting of public health directives and deciding to lean into it, rather than moving to quell it. But it’s clear why President Trump has. For his entire term, the economy has been the president’s golden ticket to re-election. While COVID-19 decimated employment numbers, this increase in protests and the heavy media coverage they’ve been receiving have allowed President Trump to attempt to lay the blame for Americans’ tattered personal finances at the door of their governors’ mansions. It is a political instinct that has only deepened an already gaping partisan divide in the country and it’s certainly not a ploy guaranteed to win come November 2020. Many of the governors President Trump has targeted are enjoying historic high approval ratings – a phenomenon known as a “rally around the flag”. By putting personal battles first and seeking to inflate grievances and protests against political enemies, the president has forgone his opportunity to enjoy the same wave of bi-partisan support. ![]() COVID-19: BY THE NUMBERSRolling average of protests per day: President Trump’s LIBERATE tweets came at exactly the point at which protests in the United States were accelerating for the first time since states began imposing stay-at-home orders. What followed the tweets was a further 300 per cent increase on the already rapidly-rising five day rolling average of daily protests. This peak was higher than any period in 2019, the so-called Year of Global Protest. The highest peak that year was when simultaneous protests were active against the detention of children and for stricter gun control, yet despite the lack of a pandemic, this peak was still 5 per cent lower. ![]() VIRTUAL EVENTTrade tensions and economic coercionWhat is next for the US-China-Australia relationship?While the United States and China have been engaged in a trade war for the past several years, recent actions by Beijing seem to have thrust Australia into one as well. With Australian barley, beef, iron ore and higher education all being threatened, the threat is no longer theoretical. Australia is not alone in facing coercive economic pressure from China, but the suddenness and intensity of Beijing's recent actions have caught many by surprise. Understanding the pattern of Chinese behaviour around the world, and the tools which are effective in responding, will be critical as Australia charts its course forward. To discuss these issues, please join us for a webinar event featuring the authors of A New Arsenal for Competition - Elizabeth Rosenberg, Peter Harrell and Ashley Feng of the Center for a New American Security - along with John Lee and Charles Edel of the United States Studies Centre. WHEN: Manage your email preferences | Forward this email to a friend United States Studies Centre ![]() |