Trouble viewing this email? View it in your browser.  |  Forward to a Friend

Quarterly Newsletter

January 2012

Volume 4 Number 4

NON-PROFIT INVESTMENT REPORT

In This Issue:

  • Market Commentary
  • Q4 2011 Asset Class Returns
  • Additional Market Indicators
  • What's happened to investments the last 10 years?
  • Investment Policy structure

Attention Non-Profit CEO's and CFO's!

This newsletter contains timely information for your non-profit organization.  The table of asset class returns and other articles may help you assess the performance of your investment program and portfolio.

Market Commentary

Quarterly market performance was volatile throughout 2011.  For example, the S&P 500 was up 5.9 percent in Quarter 1, up 0.1 percent in Quarter 2, down 16.2 percent in Quarter 3 and up 11.8 percent in Quarter 4.  After all the ups and down, this major market index finished almost exactly where it started.  Investors in this broad asset class recorded a modest return for the year if they chose to reinvest dividends.  Other asset classes, like small cap equities, international equities, and natural resources, did not fare as well.  The chart below shows the wide range of results of typical asset classes.

Here are the 2011 returns of typical benchmarks for selected asset classes.  A diversified portfolio may include some investments in many (or all) of these asset classes.  The table is sorted by percentage return for the full year.

• Asset Class Returns in this table are represented by Benchmark performance numbers derived from Thomson Financial, Investment View software research tool.  Organizations cannot invest directly in an index.  Index returns do not include investment advisory fees or trading expenses.  An investment benchmark is a standard against which the performance of an individual security or group of securities is measured.  For example, the average annual performance of a class of securities over time is a benchmark against which the current performance of members of that class and the class itself can be measured.

• Actual portfolios should be constructed based upon an individual or entities specific financial resources, investment goals, risk tolerances, investing time horizons, tax situation, and other relevant factors.  Not all recommendations will be suitable for all investors.  Individual allocations and performance will vary.

•  Performance results shown do not include a deduction for investment management fees or expenses.  If management fees and expenses were included, the returns would likely be reduced by one percentage point or more for the annualized management fee, and there would also be additional trading commissions and expenses.

• Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.  There is no guarantee that historical returns will be repeated, achieved, or met in the future.  There is no guarantee that annual returns will be achieved or met in any year, especially during times of high market volatility.

Interest rates, energy prices, unemployment rates and major U.S. market performance are some of the fundamental indicators about the health of our economy.

What has happened to investments the last 10 years?

The last ten years have been an interesting ride for all investors.  It has now been a full decade since the horrific acts of terrorism in our country.  During the period we have endured two recessions, a real estate collapse, and a financial market near meltdown.

Consider the S&P 500 which is often viewed as one of the best single guages of the US Large Cap equities market and represents approximately 75 percent of the value of all US stocks.  It ended 2001 at 1148.08.  Ten years later, at the close of 2011, it had risen to 1257.60 representing less than a 10% overall gain.  However, the average annual return, including dividends, was 2.92%.

All of the other asset classes in our table of returns (except International Real Estate) had BETTER average annual returns over the same ten year time period.  Therefore, creating a diversified portfolio that included a broader mix of fixed income, equity, domestic, international, and alternative asset classes would have likely resulted in better overall returns.

For example, a diversified portfolio consisting of 40% US Aggregate Bond, 20% S&P 500, 15% International Large Cap, 10% US Large Cap Value, 10% US Small Cap, and 5% US Real Estate had an average annual return of 5.20%.  (NOTE: You cannot invest in an index.  Past performance is not an guarantee of future returns).

Not all organizations have the same investment objectives so no single asset allocation model can be considered ideal.  What is important is to take some time to clearly document your organization's investment objectives in an Investment Policy Statement.  The future remains unpredictable, yet diversification has proven to be an appropriate course of action in the past.

Investment Policy Structure

A thorough Investment Policy Statement (IPS) is among the most important documents that a Board of Directors, as fiduciaries, should keep up-to-date.  The IPS defines the investment objective, strategy, and process in sufficient detail to guide the actions of all parties, safeguard the organization's assets, and fulfill the statutory fiduciary obligations of the Board.  The following is an example of the important sections that should be considered in an IPS.

  • Contact Information:  Provides basic information like name, address, telephone number, key contact, email address, etc. for the organization and key third parties (like investment advisors).
  • Executive Summary:  Quick reference for type of organization, fiduciary standard of care, tax-id, assets, investment pool name(s), time horizon, targeted rate-of-return, and strategic asset allocation tables.
  • Purpose:  Briefly describes the organization's background and states the overall purpose of the IPS (i.e., document a prudent investment process and affirm fiduciary duty of trustees) and the investment funds (donor intent, purpose, beneficiaries, spending/giving goals, etc.).
  • Statement of Objectives:  For organizations with multiple investment pools, this section may include a separate description for each pool describing important guidelines such as portfolio description, investment time horizon, risk tolerance, targeted rate-of-return, and spending goals.
  • Restrictions on Use:  Define as appropriate.
  • Spending/Withdrawal Policy:  Even if this policy is documented in a stand-alone document or as part of an operational plan, it should be restated in some form here for completeness.
  • Portfolio Management Rules:  This section defines the processes to be used for managing the portfolio after implementation.  It addresses items such as how to support liquidity needs, how to handle new contributions, special needs, investment earnings, and establishing criteria for transfer of funds between portfolios.  It may also addess extraordinary circumstances arising from extreme market volatility, such as how to adjust withdrawals in periods when the portfolio has negative returns.
  • Asset Class Guidelines:  Provides the written documentation to guide the investment process.  It includes descriptions for allowable asset classes, restrictions on investments, asset allocation, asset selection, and rebalancing guidelines.
  • Implementation Guidelines:  Establishes the due diligence criteria for selecting each investment manager or fund within each approved asset class.
  • Monitoring:  Defines the performance objectives and benchmarks to be used to measure progress against those objectives.  Also can establish the report types, required content, and frequency.  It may also specify watch-list criteria for monitoring the ongoing suitability of investment holdings and details the process for regularly measuring and reviewing the various expenses of the investment program.
  • Duties and Responsibilities:  Clearly delineates the responsibilities of the organization's board, sub-committees and staff.  Also defines the responsibilities of any third parties.
  • IPS Review:  Defines the schedule for periodic review of the IPS to ensure it accurately represents the organization's needs, goals, and investment process.
  • Approval:  Signatures of organizational leaders, effective dates, and revision history.

Some organizations may also choose to have the IPS reviewed by an attorney knowledgeable in this specific area of law.  The final document will likely be 15 to 20 pages in length.

RPJ Investment Advisory Services

If you are considering using the services of an investment advisor to assist with the prudent management of your funds, we would consider it a privilege to have the opportunity to serve you.

For more information about our firm and our services please visit our website or give us a call at 703-821-6655.

Rembert Pendleton Jackson | 7647 Leesburg Pike | Falls Church, VA 22043
(703) 821-6655 | (877) 821-6655
info@rpjadvisors.com | www.rpjadvisors.com

If you would like to unsubscribe from our newsletter, please click here .