Richard Parkins is the former director of EMM and the current Executive Director of the American Friends of the Episcopal Church in Sudan (AFRECS), a group formed in 2005 to build a bridge between Episcopalians in the U.S. and the approximately four million-member Episcopal Church of Sudan. Through AFRECS, Parkins works extensively with people of faith in both nations to raise awareness of the situation in Sudan and to strive for a peaceful future there. He was kind enough to share a few minutes with EMM to talk about the referendum for secession of South Sudan and its implications for the thousands of Sudanese refugees living in the U.S. as the vote was taking place.
EMM: Thanks for taking the time to talk. Can you explain the significance of the events taking place in Sudan this month?
Parkins: This is the culmination of a more than 50-year journey that Southern Sudanese have made toward freedom, and likely independence. Sudan, ever since it became a country, has been in a state of turmoil, and there has been civil strife between the North and the South, between Christians and Muslims, between Arabs and Africans. It’s been a multi-faceted crisis.
Q: How did AFRECS come into being?
A: As a result of hundreds and hundreds of Sudanese resettling in the United States, many of us became aware that there was a crisis in Sudan, and the refugees were its victims. Refugees are not only seeking safety, but they – either intentionally or inadvertently – bear witness to the fact that there is a crisis.
It was also a combination of some of us visiting Sudan, and a growing realization that the Episcopal Church of Sudan was a real force in protecting these people. We decided that we needed to take this growing interest in Sudan and form an ongoing network of support and advocacy.
Q: What’s the connection between the Episcopal Church and Sudan?
A: From my experience with the refugee groups with whom EMM worked, the Sudanese were among those who most strongly identified with the Episcopal Church.
Once they got into a community, they would invariably seek out an Episcopal Church, because the Church had been their anchor, had been their guide, had been their refuge during the crisis, during their journey to safety.
Q: What do you remember most strongly about the initial Sudanese resettlement period?
A: The thing I remember [most] from those early days of resettlement was the incredible motivation that the Sudanese refugees had to understand their new society and culture, and to learn English. There was a lot of catching up that had to happen, but they were eager participants in whatever opportunities were out there.
But at the same time, they were intensely committed to the well being, the safety and the protection of those whom they had left behind. They never forgot that they had come from a country where thousands and thousands were on the brink of starvation and lived with daily threats.
And I think that what you’re witnessing today is a day that many of them thought would never come. So, particularly if this referendum goes forward peacefully, they will have sort of come full circle.
Q: So refugees didn’t expect this to happen in the near future?
A: They probably didn’t expect it, but they never gave up hoping it would happen and they never stopped pushing for it. Their advocacy never waned. Even as they became more Americanized, if you will, that never diminished their loyalty to a free and peaceful Sudan.
Q: How are refugees in the U.S. responding to this vote?
A: They’re terribly excited about it. I think that many of them will be eager to return to South Sudan, maybe not to live, but certainly to reconnect with family members. Many of them do not know whether family members are alive or not.
And I think some of them will maybe want to go back and find ways to assist. Many Sudanese have been engaged in projects – school projects and what have you – trying to be helpful to people in their villages. I would expect that there would be more and more efforts made to help rebuild South Sudan.
Q: What do you expect to happen in the event the South does secede?
A: Well, there are a lot of unresolved issues. There are border issues; there’s the question of sharing oil resources. Most of the oil is in the South, but the oil is a critical resource for both North and South.
But a major issue for all of the advocates is the fate of a couple of million Christians and religious minorities in the North. Will they feel compelled to leave? Can their citizenship be protected? Can their rights be protected? These are major unresolved and contentious issues.
Q: How can people stay informed and offer support?
A: Episcopalians in this country need to seek more opportunities for partnership with the Episcopal Church of Sudan. I would say that many Episcopalians had no idea that there are more than four million Episcopalians in Sudan in 31 dioceses, and a church that’s twice the size of our church in this country. And over and above that, it’s a highly respected player as a major civil institution, as well as a religious body.
The referendum is not an occasion to relax and say, “We now have an independent South Sudan, so they can go forward.” I think it opens up a new chapter that’s just as full of challenges – and hopefully opportunities – as we’ve ever had. The opportunities are many if the church chooses to engage them.
It is a time for hope, but we cannot be anything other than very attentive to the future of this country and particularly our church friends there.
Visit AFRECS at
www.afrecs.org, and sign up for the E-blast to stay informed about Sudan and the Church.