Editor's note

Late last week, US media reported that President Donald Trump was planning to withdraw the country from the North American Free Trade Agreement. A day later, the president announced that he would instead be seeking a renegotiation of the deal, which he had blamed for job American job losses during his election campaign.

The fact is that economists had under-estimated the deleterious effects of trade on workers and the 23-year-old deal could benefit from a rejig, argues Rodrigo Zeidan. But the problem is that vested interests rather than workers might be the ultimate winners from the proposed changes.

Reema Rattan

Global Commissioning Editor

Top story

During the US presidential election campaign, Donald Trump blamed NAFTA for US job losses. Tracie Van Auken/EPA

Redesigning NAFTA is not a bad idea if workers rather than vested interests win

Rodrigo Zeidan, NYU Shanghai

There's ample space to renegotiate some terms from the original agreement that would improve social welfare across the region.

Science + Technology

Business + Economy

  • How Australia should react to the Trump tax cuts

    Pascalis Raimondos, Queensland University of Technology; Sara L. McGaughey, Griffith University

    The Trump tax cut will create new investment in America, but at the expense of countries like Australia

Arts + Culture

Environment + Energy