Editor's note

Thanks to the fossil fuel divestment movement, more than US$11 trillion has been shifted away from oil companies. That’s a lot of money – almost four times the UK’s GDP. But before you add your shares to the mix, or join one of the many groups around the world pressuring institutions to do the same, you might want to read this first.

The divestment movement targets private oil companies – but these only produce 10% of the world’s oil. Without addressing the still rising global demand for fossil fuels, says energy market expert Stefan Andreasson, divesting will merely transfer power to state-run oil companies – which have higher carbon footprints, and are less committed to addressing the climate crisis. As a result, divestment may increase emissions, not lower them. But there are other ways to tackle the problem, including scrapping fossil fuel subsidies and putting a price on carbon, which would impact both private and state companies.

Staying with investment worries, we look at how giving over-55s the freedom to cash out their pensions early could be costing them billions. And if Donald Trump’s impeachment hearing has got you wondering what quid pro quo really means and where it comes from, wonder no more.

As the UK general election campaign continues, our experts take a look at Conservative sums for the NHS – do they add up? And read why the tax and spending promises of the Conservatives and Labour leave the electorate with a choice: low-tax, individualism or generous state with unknown price tag.

Jordan Raine

Commissioning Editor

Top stories

The fossil fuel divestment movement has support across the world. depthandtime/flickr

Fossil fuel divestment will increase carbon emissions, not lower them – here’s why

Stefan Andreasson, Queen's University Belfast

Divestment doesn't affect global demand for oil, it just transfers power to state-run oil companies – which have higher carbon footprints. But there are other things we can do.

‘Not such a great idea.’ Oleg Govnev

Many over-55s can’t cope with pension freedoms – it may now be time to scrap them

David Comerford, University of Stirling

The system brought in by the government to advise retirees since the 2015 reforms may actually be making things worse.

Trump: there was no quid pro quo. Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA

Quid pro quo: the origins of the Latin term and how its uses evolved in English

Anthony Grant, Edge Hill University

The history of the Latin phrase at the centre of the impeachment investigation into Donald Trump.

Will Oliver/EPA

Conservative plan for the NHS – but does it add up?

Paula Lorgelly, UCL

Promises in the Tory manifesto on the NHS fall well short of what is needed.

Business + Economy

Education

Arts + Culture

Health + Medicine

Politics + Society

Science + Technology

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Featured events

Public Lecture: Doing Business Better - should Reading firms have a social purpose? by Professor Emma Borg

G10, Palmer Building, Whiteknights Campus, University of Reading, Reading, West Berkshire, RG6 6UR, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — University of Reading

"Plant genetics from Mendel to Monsanto" with Dame Ottoline Leyser

Oxford Martin School, 34 Broad Street, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX1 3BD, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — University of Oxford

"Nano comes to life" with Prof Sonia Contera (Live Stream Available)

Oxford Martin School, 34 Broad Street, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX1 3BD, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — University of Oxford

UEA Christmas lectures for children: A pink pigeon in a pear tree

Lecture Theatre One, UEA, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — University of East Anglia

More events
 

Contact us here to have your event listed.

For sponsorship opportunities, email us here