Editor's note

Egypt has historically adopted an aggressive approach to claims over water from the River Nile, often with threats of military action against upstream countries. Salam Abdulqadir Abdulrahman explains why Cairo’s insistence on colonial-era agreements flies in the face of today’s realities. Firstly, the Nile is shrinking and secondly, countries to the south are entitled to demand an agreement that reflects present day political realities.

Hipsters are often affiliated with progressive political and cultural movements built on socially liberal ideals. But Melissa Tandiwe Myambo writes that while they appear progressive, this isn’t always apparent when they move into lower-income urban neighbourhoods. In fact, their behaviour has parallels with the practices and ideologies of the settler-colonialism of earlier centuries.

Julius Maina

Regional Editor East Africa

Top story

The Nile River during sunset in Luxor, Egypt. EPA-EFE/Khaled Elfiqi

Agreements that favour Egypt’s rights to Nile waters are an anachronism

Salam Abdulqadir Abdulrahman, University of Human Development, Iraq

The threat to use force to defend Egypt's right to water from the Nile has been a common theme through successive governments.

Arts + Culture

Environment + Energy

Business + Economy

From our international editions

 
 
 
 

Would you like to republish any of these articles?

It’s free to republish, here are the guidelines. Contact us on africa-republish@theconversation.com in case you need assistance.