|
It’s been a good news week this week. In terms of reducing alcohol related harm, anyway.
In Western Australia, the Education and Health Standing Committee’s report entitled ‘Alcohol: Reducing the harm and curbing the culture of excess’ has been released, and with it some cracking recommendations.
The report challenges the State Government to establish a target to return the State’s current annual per capita alcohol consumption of 12.4 litres to the national average of 10.4 litres per capita within four years, and that’s just the beginning.
The report suggests:
• allowing police to conduct controlled purchasing operations in licensed premises;
• putting restrictions on purchasing take away liquor until the age of 20;
• restrictions on the secondary supply of alcohol to minors;
• reducing hours of trade for premises having problems with violence and/or breaching the Liquor Control Act;
• phasing out alcohol promotions from times and placements with high exposure to young people; and
• phasing out the sponsorship of sporting bodies in WA by alcohol companies,
amongst a whole raft of other (54 to be precise) recommendations.
A recommendation around secondary supply never fails to fill me with delight – now we just need the ACT and SA to get on the secondary supply train!
But better still – a recommendation around a split purchase age (you can enter licensed premises is at 18, but have to be 20 to buy packaged liquor) is pretty innovative. I think I’ve mentioned before that it’s being contemplated in NZ, which has generated a bit of discussion about it here as well.
For those GrogWatchers who don’t know - the thinking behind it is that more young people will be drinking in a ‘supervised' environment provided by licensed premises, which is preferable to them buying alcohol from packaged liquor outlets and drinking behind a bus stop.
It may also result in a decrease in the supply of alcohol to underage young people – given that a 17 year old is less likely to have a 20 year old friend who can purchase alcohol for them, where as I’d be surprised if there was a 17 year old out there that didn’t have an 18 year old friend.
It’ll be interesting to see what the WA Government does with recommendations. But in the meantime – what do you think about a split purchase age? Good idea, or should we just raise the drinking age across the board?
Until next week,
Sarah Jaggard
Community Mobilisation Policy Officer
|