|
A note from...
Aviva Rutkin
Big Data + Applied Mathematics Editor
|
|
The 2020 race for president has barely begun, and I’m already exhausted.
Next week, the Democrats will hold their first presidential debate. There are so many candidates that the event will be split into two nights, with 10 candidates each. Another four have been asked to sit the debates out.
Mathematicians say 24 candidates may be too many. According to something called the Condorcet paradox, the more candidates that there are, the more likely it is that voters will not be able to agree on the best choice.
Alexander Strang and Peter Thomas at Case Western University break the math down for us.
Also today: Why you shouldn’t spend your Social Security on brain supplements, five charts about burning trash and why people faint.
|
Top story
|
Ten of the 2020 Democratic candidates.
REUTERS/Files
Alexander Strang, Case Western Reserve University; Peter Thomas, Case Western Reserve University
The more candidates that there are, the likelier it is that voters cannot come to a consensus on the best candidate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most read on site
|
-
Jelena Kecmanovic, Georgetown University
Just 5% of US adults say using social media is good for their mental health. A psychologist offers some tips to help the other 95%.
-
Richard Gunderman, Indiana University
Alex Trebek raised an interesting question when he thanked well-wishers for supporting him in his fight against pancreatic cancer: Do prayers and good thoughts really have a medical effect?
-
Stephen Rice, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Scott Winter, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Skipping the hassle of flying – and the different headache of driving – gives self-driving cars a leg up when people are choosing how to travel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|