Editor's note

Rwanda has banned political cartoons that humiliate government officials. While these cartoons are a key indicator of media freedom and a country’s democratic health, they can also be regressive. Daniel Hammett writes that cartoonists must remain sensitive to local histories.

It’s cheaper to provide services to people living in urban areas. But local authorities find it difficult to raise money to invest in infrastructure and need national government support. Kenya and South Africa have managed to get it right. Sarah Colenbrander and Ian Palmer explain.

All the best.

Moina Spooner

Commissioning Editor: East Africa

Top stories

Censorship has been in the news again following Rwanda passing a new law. Shutterstock

Cartoonists can be an important voice of dissent: but they can also be divisive

Daniel Hammett, University of Sheffield

Political and editorial cartoons are a key indicator of the democratic health of a country - but they can also be regressive.

Shutterstock

African cities can raise more money. Kenya and South Africa offer useful lessons

Sarah Colenbrander, University of Leeds; Ian Palmer

South Africa and Kenya have some valuable lessons for other African countries on how to finance urban infrastructure development.

Politics + Society

Environment + Energy

From our international editions

 
 
 
 

Would you like to republish any of these articles?

It’s free to republish, here are the guidelines. Contact us on africa-republish@theconversation.com in case you need assistance.