Editor's note

South Africa’s governing party, the African National Congress, announced last week that it’s going ahead with amending the Constitution to allow for land expropriation without compensation. The move is seen by some as a threat to property rights in the country. But, Steven Friedman argues, the constitutional amendment is unlikely to introduce a radically different approach. Rather, it’s likely to clarify the Constitution’s current provisions on land expropriation. In separate articles, Pierre de Vos explains the intricacies of changing the country’s Constitution while Joana Bezerra sets out what’s wrong with the current system of settling land claims in conservation areas.

Sibonelo Radebe

Business + Economy Editor

Top stories

Changes to the Constitution may boost, not weaken, South African property rights

Steven Friedman, University of Johannesburg

Clarifying when and how the South African constitution allows for expropriation of land without compensation will strengthen property rights.

Explainer: what’s involved in changing South Africa’s Constitution

Pierre de Vos, University of Cape Town

South Africa's constitution has been amended 17 times already. But, the procedure for doing so is onerous.

Environment + Energy

Business + Economy

Science + Technology

From our international editions