Criminal Intelligence Coordinating Council's Five in Five No images? Click here ![]() New ToolRural Community Action Guide
The Trump Administration released a new tool to assist rural community leaders in building an effective local response to the crisis of addiction. The Rural Community Action Guide is based on lessons learned from roundtable discussions held in over a dozen states, as well as the experiences of several rural stakeholders. The guide includes background information, recommended action steps, and promising practices for a range of issues related to drug addiction in rural America. Resource Page Mass Violence and Terrorism The Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) Training and Technical Assistance Center (TTAC) offers a variety of resources to support communities in their efforts to prepare a response to incidents of mass violence. OVC TTAC’s Mass Violence Toolkit contains information on best practices for responding to victims of mass violence and terrorism throughout each of the three response phases — the Partnerships and Planning phase, the Response phase, and the Recovery phase. OVC TTAC also features a webinar series that builds upon and supplements the information in the toolkit that is available to view anytime. Webinar Beyond CompStat: The Role of EBP This webinar will discuss what it means to use evidence-based policing (EBP), explain how to apply research in the field, and what steps to take to design your own research study. Concepts will include the importance of comparison groups when evaluating a program, project, or intervention. After discussing these statistical concepts and criminological theory, the presenters will explain how CompStat — although a tool for its time — is now an outdated way of holding police executives accountable and most often leads to “whack-a-mole” policing. Date: Thursday, February 13 NIST News Forensic Methods for Getting Data From Damaged Mobile Phones Criminals sometimes damage their mobile phones to destroy evidence, but forensics experts can often retrieve the evidence anyway. Researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) tested how well these forensic methods work. To conduct the study, NIST researchers loaded data onto ten popular models of phones. They then extracted the data or had outside experts extract the data for them to determine if retrieval would be successful. The results are published in a series of no-cost online reports. This research was funded by NIST and the Department of Homeland Security’s Cyber Forensics Project. Conference 2020 National Cyber Crime Conference The eighth annual National Cyber Crime Conference (NCCC) will be held on April 21-29, 2020, in Norwood, MA. The NCCC has become the premier annual cyber crime and digital evidence training event for law enforcement, prosecutors, and forensic examiners. Instruction at the conference is designed to help attendees conquer the most significant challenges in investigations and prosecutions involving digital evidence. The Criminal Intelligence Coordinating Council’s (CICC) Five in 5 is a collection of resources that may be of interest to law enforcement and homeland security partners working to improve the nation’s ability to develop and share criminal intelligence. The Five in 5 highlights promising practices, case studies, and success stories and identifies products, reports, training, and toolkits to build, implement, and enhance a criminal intelligence capability. You are encouraged to share this e-mail with your association members, colleagues, department/organization personnel, and others, as appropriate. Please contact cicc@iir.com to submit a success story or resource for consideration in the CICC’s Five in 5. To view the Five in 5 archive, visit: https://it.ojp.gov/FiveIn5. The mission of the CICC is to advocate for and support state, local, and tribal law enforcement and homeland security agencies and personnel in their efforts to develop and share criminal intelligence for the promotion of public safety and the security of our nation. This publication is funded in whole or in part through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this publication (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided). |