Criminal Intelligence Coordinating Council Five in 5 No Images? Click here The Criminal Intelligence Coordinating Council’s (CICC) Five in 5 is a collection of resources that may be of interest to law enforcement and homeland security partners working to improve the nation’s ability to develop and share criminal intelligence. The Five in 5 highlights promising practices, case studies, and success stories and identifies products, reports, training, and toolkits to build, implement, and enhance a criminal intelligence capability. You are encouraged to share this e-mail with your association members, colleagues, department/organization personnel, and others, as appropriate. Please contact cicc@iir.com to submit a success story or resource for consideration in the CICC’s Five in 5. To view the Five in 5 archive, visit: https://www.it.ojp.gov/FiveIn5. New National Fusion Center Association VideoFusion Centers and Preventing Threats to the Homeland “Fusion Centers and Preventing Threats to the Homeland” is the second in a series of videos to be developed by the Florida Fusion Center, highlighting the numerous functions and successes of fusion centers across the nation. Protecting the homeland by preventing and mitigating threats is a key function of fusion centers. This video describes the role fusion centers play in developing partnerships and collaborating across sectors and industries to stay ahead of and mitigate threats, including identifying indicators and behaviors that are a part of the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative. The video also highlights the importance of collecting, analyzing, and sharing information across jurisdictions and specializations nationwide. The video is available on the National Criminal Intelligence Resource Center and is intended for use by fusion centers and partners throughout the Fusion Center Network. It may be downloaded for use in presentations or for other fusion center purposes. Harmonizing Police Technology Acquisitions With Policing Strategy National Institute of Justice
For police agencies, a major technology acquisition can be a change agent that elevates operations while building trust within communities. But when police technology choices are not sufficiently integrated with a department’s overall policing strategy, inefficiency and disappointed expectations can follow, according to a new study supported by the National Institute of Justice. Researchers found that a complex and varied set of factors typically drives police technology acquisition decisions—but often the department’s policing philosophy or strategy is not one of them. The research team made recommendations for developing a better police technology model, including:
An essential takeaway from the study is that law enforcement agencies should have a robust internal technology evaluation process. Incident Response Tool for SchoolsWebinarOn August 23, 2018, from 2:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., ET, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP)-funded Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program will host the "Internet Crimes Against Children/iKeepSafe Incident Response Tool for Schools" webinar. This webinar will discuss a free resource designed to help schools respond to technology-related incidents, including cyberbullying, sexting, hacking, and threats of violence. The webinar will identify how school officials can use this tool to work with law enforcement and other stakeholders to investigate and develop responses to all types of technology-related incidents. Arlington, TX: A Community Policing Story A Guide for Law Enforcement and Community Screenings
The Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Office has released the resource titled “Arlington, TX: A Community Policing Story—A Guide for Law Enforcement and Community Screenings.” The guide is designed to assist law enforcement and community groups in facilitating screenings and discussions of the 28-minute film Not in Our Town—Arlington, TX: A Community Policing Story. Produced in collaboration with the COPS Office, the film follows the Arlington, Texas, Police Department as it navigates its own series of tragedies: a gang-related death, an officer-involved shooting death of two teens, and the deaths of five officers ambushed in the neighboring city of Dallas, Texas. This guide provides discussion questions and tips for organizing internal law enforcement agency and community screenings, information about procedural justice and legitimacy, and supplemental resources. Used together, the film and guide can help agencies work together with personnel and community members to initiate conversations about trust building, procedural justice, and institutional legitimacy to improve relationships between police and the communities they serve. Recent Violent Crime Trends in the United StatesCongressional Research Service In June 2018, the Congressional Research Service released the report “Recent Violent Crime Trends in the United States.” This resource provides an analysis of changes in violent crime since 1960, with a focus on changes from 2014 to 2016 in violent crime and homicide rates in the 48 largest cities in the United States for which violent crime and homicide data were submitted to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Uniform Crime Reporting Program. The results of the analysis suggest the following:
The report also provides a review of research on whether increases in violent crime in some cities can be attributed to a “Ferguson effect” and concludes with a discussion about select policy options that Congress could consider for providing assistance to cities experiencing increases in violent crime.The mission of the CICC is to advocate for and support state, local, and tribal law enforcement and homeland security agencies and personnel in their efforts to develop and share criminal intelligence for the promotion of public safety and the security of our nation. This publication is funded in whole or in part through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this publication (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided). |