|
No images? Click here Published by the Bolch Judicial Institute of Duke Law July 2026 • Judicature International Dear Reader, Today is the International Day of Judicial Well-Being. Celebrated annually on July 25, the day is meant to be a time of reflection and consideration of topics related to mental health and well-being that, for too long, have remained in the shadows. Fortunately, with each new report, study, and conversation, more light is being shed on these important topics. This edition of Judicature International features two contributions to that growing body of work: an article by Carly Schrever on the judicial career cycle and a short research brief I wrote about a report released earlier this month on the well-being of Canada’s federally appointed judges. As Schrever writes in her excellent piece, “forewarned is forearmed.” May we use today to expand our understanding of mental health and well-being and apply that knowledge to make a difference. — Eric Surber JULY 2026 FEATURE The Judicial Career Cycle — How Stress and Well-Being Are Experienced at Different StagesDrawing on interviews with 59 Australian judges and magistrates, Carly Schrever explores how the judicial career cycle can shape well-being.Judicial appointment is often viewed as the culmination of a legal career — a professional pinnacle rather than the beginning of a new career cycle. Yet judicial service may span decades, and the demands, rewards, and psychological experience of the role can change significantly over time. Drawing on interviews with 59 judges and magistrates from five Australian courts, Carly Schrever examines the distinct stages of the judicial career and how stress, satisfaction, and professional identity shift across them. Originally published in the May 2026 issue of the Judicial Officers’ Bulletin, the article is reprinted here with the author’s permission. RESEARCH IN BRIEF New Canadian Study Links Judicial Well-Being to Workload, Safety, and Court ResourcesThe report, released July 9, identifies several factors associated with symptoms of burnout and offers potential reforms.A new national study commissioned by the Canadian Judicial Council examines how workload, safety concerns, and workplace conditions affect the health and well-being of Canada’s federally appointed judges. Drawing on interviews and survey responses from more than 65% of the judiciary, the report also identifies potential institutional reforms. In this research brief, web editor Eric Surber highlights findings related to judicial safety and challenges associated with self-represented litigation.
Global Judicial News: |