SENATors demand withdrawal from iter
Democratic-led Senate
appropriators have the International
Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), the fusion-energy research lab being
built in France, in the cross-hairs. In a report
accompanying the stalled energy-water spending bill for 2015, the
senators cite rising costs, delays, and management problems and tell
the Department of Energy "to work with the Department of State to
withdraw from the
ITER project" and revamp its fusion strategy. The GOP-controlled House
flatly disagrees, meaning this will be a key issue in future
House-Senate negotiations. The House-passed appropriation bill calls
for spending more on ITER than the administration requested.
HIGH
BAR FOR HUBS: Two energy
research hubs, Fuels from
Sunlight
and Modeling and Simulation for
Nuclear Reactors, are up for a five-year renewal, having been
recognized for "resolving
major
technological and science roadblocks." But Senate appropriators say "the bar
for renewal of these hubs
should be high" and involve independent peer review.
FASTER! Believing
that "the United
States
must remain the world leader in
high performance computing," the Senate panel wants to DOE to make
development of an exascale system "one of its
highest
priorities." The new system is due in 2022. Appropriators are also
enthusiastic about hydrogen
fuel cells. They urge DOE to transform the size, cost, scalability, and
interoperability of new retail hydrogen stations.
WASTED
FUEL? Senators think DOE takes
too narrow a view of biomass as a new energy source. They want the
agency to include "biosolids
derived
from the municipal wastewater treatment and agricultural processes" and
work on technology that processes biosolids from wastewater treatment
into clean water as well as energy.
3
MANUFACTURING INSTITUTES: The
Senate panel would include $42 million for the wide
bandgap
semiconductor institute,
$28 million for the advanced composites institute, and $28 million "for
a third
institute to be awarded in fiscal year 2015."
NUKE
PREFERENCES: While not adding to
an existing pot of money for small modular reactors, the appropriators
add money for the "Supercritical
Transformational
Electric Power Generation Initiative;" reactor
concepts research; advanced reactor technologies; fuel cycle
R&D; and development of meltdown-resistant
nuclear fuels.
FRONTIER
FUNDS: The appropriations panel
offers up to $100 million for Energy Frontier Research Centers, saying
recent reviews show EFRCs "are
demonstrating scientific
productivity and world leadership, and are making progress in
ways that would not have been likely through individual efforts" at
national labs and universities. It also says "the
discovery of new materials and
chemical structures with novel properties are crucial to U.S.
competitiveness."
SMALL BITES: The
House is taking what Inside
Higher Ed calls "baby steps" toward reauthorizing the Higher
Education Act. This week, it "unanimously
passed legislation boosting competency-based education and
overwhelmingly approved an overhaul of how the Education Department
discloses college data," the newspaper reports. While supportive,
Democrats "said they were disappointed that the bills do not go far
enough in addressing rising levels of student debt and the growing
price of college." Senate appropriators, meanwhile, moved to put
new restrictions on for-profit colleges. According to CQ, "Institutions
would
have to certify that they do not use 'revenues derived from education
assistance funds provided in any form under any federal law.” The
prohibition would apply to veterans' and active-duty education benefits.
ABDICATION
OR INNOVATION? "The
steady erosion of state investment in public
higher education over the last few decades reflects a stunning
abdication of
responsibility on the part of states to preserve college
affordability,"
Sen. Tom Harkin said in opening a hearing
on
the states' role in higher education. Ranking Republican Lamar
Alexander said "states must lead the way," but said they "are
doing innovative work…. I
am interested in how the
federal government is getting in the way."
'COMPETES'
moving forward: With a
strong assertion
of
the need for government-funded research, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.)
has circulated a draft reauthorization of the landmark 2007 law, which
was reauthorized in 2010. He's expected to introduce it any day now
into a gridlocked Senate. The House version has splintered into pieces.
A GOP measure reauthorizing the National Science Foundation and
National Institute of Standards and Technology has caused a partisan
split, but noncontroversial sections of energy legislation are gaining
bipartisan support.
CONFERENCE
CURBS: Organizations
that draw significant attendance from government science agencies
are worried about bipartisan legislation that would enshrine in
law the restrictions set down by the Office of Management and
Budget in the wake of the 2012 General Services Administration scandal.
A Senate bill would limit the number of agency employees attending
international conferences to 50 and put a $500,000 spending cap on an
agency's spending for a single conference. Congress would have to be
notified in advance of any waivers of these limits.
|