No images? Click here ![]() House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s recent trip to Taiwan over the White House’s objections provides clarity on two fronts. First, the trip—coupled with new bipartisan legislation in the Senate, the Taiwan Policy Act of 2022—shows a remarkable willingness in Congress to provide necessary materials and support to allies and to get serious about deterring adversaries’ aggression. Second, Russia and China continue to support each other’s revanchist advances. Russian leaders denounced the speaker’s visit repeatedly and defended the People’s Republic of China’s highly provocative military exercises that followed. The United States now faces a Moscow-Beijing axis that will continue to challenge US strategy, especially during an economic downturn. US leaders can potentially galvanize American and ally support to deter these two nations, if they can follow through on a wise strategy. -Rebeccah
Heinrichs Hudson HighlightsHudson Institute Japan Chair and former US National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster and KDI Director Rebeccah Heinrichs recently spoke on a virtual panel about the implications of Speaker Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan. Hudson Asia-Pacific Security Chair Patrick M. Cronin moderated the discussion. During the event, McMaster highlighted why the US and its allies need to bolster their resolve as Moscow and Beijing double down on support for each other’s regional threats and aggression.
Rebeccah L. Heinrichs | National Review “Russia is modernizing its nuclear weapons while saber-rattling on NATO’s eastern front, and China is in the middle of a nuclear strategic breakout while threatening Taiwan. Nevertheless, President Joe Biden wants the United States to roll back efforts to improve its nuclear deterrent — but in a remarkable act of bipartisanship, Congress has refused Biden’s plans for the rollback.” Luke Coffey | Hudson Institute “China is watching the war in Ukraine closely. Russia is China’s junior partner. A weakened or defeated Russia means a weaker China. Beijing is also watching how Western powers support Ukraine, so a strong and victorious Ukraine makes Taiwan stronger too. Some have suggested that the US should sacrifice its security interest in Ukraine to focus on the threat from China. The choice between security in Europe or security in the Indo-Pacific is a false dichotomy. In terms of US national interests, these two regions are intimately linked.” Marshall Billingslea and Victoria Coates | National Review “So while Europe began scrambling for alternatives to Russian energy imports, and the US and U.K. declared an outright ban on them, China started a massive buying spree—at discounted prices—of Russian gas and oil. This diversified its supply during the current global energy crisis, as Russia quickly surpassed Saudi Arabia as the lead exporter of energy to China in May, a position it has now held for three months and counting. In other words, Xi is bankrolling Putin’s invasion in exchange for cheap energy, an arrangement that suits them both handsomely.” Bryan Clark | Breaking Defense “Retaining America’s undersea edge will require US submariners to employ techniques developed by aviators to overcome air defense systems. Bombers and fighters depend on electronic warfare aircraft to suppress air defenses by jamming radars and radios or destroying enemy systems with anti-radiation missiles. Similarly, submarines making their way into enemy waters will need unmanned vehicle escorts to counter the sensors and weapons China and Russia are deploying undersea.” Bryan Clark, Trent Hone, Dmitry Filipoff, Seth Cropsey, and Timothy A. Walton | Hudson Institute “But gaining an advantage against Chinese or Russian fleets will take more than fighting effectively at the level of individual ships, squadrons, or ground units. US naval forces will likely be the ‘away team’ in confrontations against the PLA or Russian Federation (RF) military, placing them at a disadvantage in terms of firepower, sustainment, and sensing. Add to that the near parity of opposing platforms and weapons, and the US fleet will be hard-pressed to win via a series of one-on-one engagements.” Rebeccah L. Heinrichs | Providence “Protecting hearth and home doesn’t mean much when, across the globe, those who seek to displace and destroy American power are on the rise, destabilizing everything from food supply to energy commodities to nations’ sovereignty in their wake. A more sound approach to evaluating our foreign policy begins by conceding that, to secure domestic prosperity, retreat will not meet the demands of this dangerous, highly dynamic environment.” ![]() Key InsightsHal Brands and Michael Beckley | Wall Street Journal
Ian Williams and Masao Dahlgren | Defense News
Katherine Walla | New Atlanticist
James Holmes | 19FortyFive
![]() Top ReadsCNN Exclusive: FBI Investigation Determined Chinese-Made Huawei Equipment Could Disrupt US Nuclear Arsenal Communications |