|

Senior leaders of India's opposition, including Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi, were taken into police custody in New Delhi on Tuesday during a march demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar, the latest escalation in a weeks-long confrontation over the integrity of the country's voter rolls.
Members of the Parliament from INDIA bloc gathered at Parliament's Makar Dwar and set out on foot for Nirvachan Sadan, the Election Commission of India's (ECI) headquarters. Security personnel stopped the leaders and MPs from proceeding to the commission's building, and MPs from the Biju Janatap Dal (BJD), which is not part of the INDIA bloc, also joined the march, which was halted at Parliament Street.
While most opposition MPs were held back, Gandhi, Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and othter Congress members entered the grounds of Akashvani Bhawan, about 200 metres from the commission's office, insisting they be allowed to meet the election commissioners. Gandhi climbed over layered steel barricades, waving the national flag, before slipping through police cordons into the All India Radio premises. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav and Trinamool Congress MPs Abhishek Banarjee and Derek O'Brien were among those detained after police stopped the march.
The sit-in began around noon and lasted past 8pm, when police removed Gandhi and others into vans and buses as the MPs resisted. They were released after nearly two hours in custody, ending roughly nine hours of protests in central Delhi. Although some outlets described the leaders as "arrested", Indian police and most domestic reports used the term "detained," which typically referes to temporary custody without formal charges.
Accounts of the incident differed. Gandhi said he was standing with 300 Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha MPs, while Delhi Police said no permission had been sought or granted for the rally and that, after repeated non-compliance, around 260 people were detained, including 10 MPs.
Competing claims
Gandhi accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Home Minister Amit Shah and RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat of having "hijacked" the country through "vote chori" (vote theft), with Kumar's help. The Congress party said Gandhi had been dragged from a peaceful sit-in.
The Election Commission disputed the opposition's account of a refused meeting. It said no political party had sought an appointment until 4 pm, and that police later informed it that the proposed meeting was with a group of 240 MPs at the Parliament House complex. The commission described the venue and manner of the request as unusual under its established protocol. Police said the leaders were detained from Akashvani Bhavan to maintain law and order, having entered the premises without permission.
The governing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) dismissed the protest. BJP leaders characterised it as "daily drama" and "street anarchy" and accused Gandhi of attacking constitutional institutions, while national spokesperson Sambit Patra alleged that the opposition was trying to create anarchy and weaken constitutional bodies for Gandhi's political benefit.
Background: the voter-roll revision
The dispute centres on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), a nationwide re-verification of electoral rolls. Opposition parties have long argued the exercise risks disenfranchising eligible voters. Similar marches have happened before: in August 2025, around 300 opposition leaders marched from parliament to the election panel and were detained, at a time when the BJP and the Election Commission rejected the accusations, with the commission saying changes to voter lists are shared with parties and complaints are investigated.
The current wave of protest was triggered by a newspaper investigation. The Indian Express reported on September 23 that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had recorded 14 objections over a 10-month period concerning decisions and procedures within the poll panel. Their objections reportedly concerned changes to Form 6 for new voters, access to electoral-roll databases and the centralisation of election software, including complaints that some orders were issued without their knowledge.
The commission pushed back. It said it was normal procedure for a commissioner to raise questions during discussion, and that all three commissioners have an equal say. Sources also noted that ECI decisions bear the signatures of all three members, and that a majority view prevails when two of the three agree. Notably, Outlook India cautioned that the investigation establishes that the objections were raised, but does not establish proven misconduct by Kumar or the ECI.
Continue reading on the website.
-Asia Media Centre
|