No images? Click here 9 FebruaryBlinken “walking and chewing gum at the same time”As the eyes of the world are on Ukraine, top US diplomat Secretary of State Antony Blinken kicks off his Indo-Pacific tour with a Quadrilateral Security Dialogue with foreign ministers in Melbourne on Friday. Ahead of the trip, when reporters pressed the State Department on whether they’re taking their eye off the ball with Ukraine, State Department spokesperson Ned Price said they’re capable of, “walking and chewing gum at the same time.” Australia isn’t just the first destination on Blinken’s itinerary, this is the first Australian visit from any Cabinet-level official since Biden took office. Joining together with Australian Foreign Minister Marise Payne, Japanese Minister for Foreign Affairs Yoshimasa Hayashi and Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, the group will tackle issues ranging from climate change to vaccine distributions in the region. The timing for the trip itself was somewhat contingent upon the Indian External Affairs Minister’s recovery from COVID-19. One thing not on the agenda? Expanding the Quad. As the four countries have deepened ties since the election of President Biden, they are increasing bilateral relationships within the group and are exploring options to strengthen ties with ASEAN and across the region. But proposals to change the Quad to a Quint by including Indonesia or South Korea don’t appear to have any traction at the moment. The strongest indicator of how well the Biden administration can walk and chew gum will be what happens with the outcomes of the Quad meeting once Blinken returns to Washington. Read the full transcript from the State Department briefing here NEWS WRAPDivided attentions
![]() If Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine again, there will no longer be a Nord Stream 2. WEBINAR | 10 February What can the Cold War teach us about strategic competition? A conversation with historian Hal BrandsChallenges the United States faces with China and Russia are frequently, and adamantly, argued to either constitute a new Cold War or not. Leading historian and former Pentagon advisor, Hal Brands, takes a different approach altogether in his new book, The Twilight Struggle: What the Cold War Teaches Us about Great Power Rivalry Today. He posits that regardless of the accuracy of Cold War comparisons, the United States should look to the history of the Cold War for lessons in how to succeed in great power rivalry today. Both the Biden and Trump administrations came to embrace US-China competition, but what should be the ultimate end goal? How should the US approach to such competition in the near term differ from a long-term approach? Where do US allies like Australia fit into this strategic debate? To discuss these issues, please join us for a webinar event with author Hal Brands in conversation with United States Studies Centre (USSC) Senior Lecturer Dr Gorana Grgic as we unpack what history has to teach about the latest stage in great power rivalry and the future of US foreign policymaking. WHEN: COST: You can also subscribe to have event invitations and reminders sent straight to your inbox, so you never have to miss an event! ANALYSISDon't be so ready to cede the upper hand to Xi, PutinDr John Lee Russia has amassed around 130,000 troops on the Ukrainian border while China is coercing a growing number of countries. Their apparent confidence is taken as evidence that authoritarian states are ascendant while democracies are increasingly seen as weak, confused and in disarray. In truth, Russia and China have a far more precarious road ahead than the democratic polities they detest. Let’s begin with the popular idea that a Russian or Chinese state ruled by one man with an iron fist means these countries are better at statecraft than democratic rivals. It is seductive reasoning. Democratically elected leaders have limited time in power, must balance different and competing interests, and cannot pursue objectives in a single-minded manner. In contrast, dictators can focus on using more elements of national power to achieve permanent ends. The actual situation is much more awkward and intractable for Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping. They seem to have become allies in their stand against the world’s liberal democracies. Both have identified themselves as the embodiment of Russian and Chinese nationalism respectively and, in the process, conflate threats to their personal power as a danger to their countries. In this sense, they are on a similar path. Look at the enduring problems they have created with this mindset; for example, their intolerance for the existence of stable, functional and prospering democracies around them. They fear these democracies will inspire dissent and cause them to be accountable for their own shortcomings. Russia is forced to use stretched resources to prop up corrupt and oppressive regimes in Kazakhstan and Belarus. China cannot allow liberal institutions in a thriving Hong Kong or accept cultural self-determination in Xinjiang and Tibet. As a result, Beijing spends more on internal security than on the People’s Liberation Army, the lion’s share of resources going towards suppressing these two restive regions. This is an excerpt from an article published by The Australian. BY THE NUMBERSUS troops around the world As the first US reinforcement troops arrive in Poland and Romania, thousands of other US troops are stationed globally in allied countries. Japan has the most US troops stationed with more than 55,000 in 2021 followed by Germany with 35,000. In 2021 1,700 US troops were stationed in Australia, primarily Marines in Darwin. Read more By the numbers analysis here VIDEOThe Quad: Will it ever work?Ahead of Blinken's visit to Australia and the first in-person minister level meeting between the Quad countries, take a look back at one of USSC's past webinars: The Quad: Will it ever work from June 2020. To discuss the challenges and future prospects of the Quad, USSC was joined by Lt General H.R. McMaster, Japan Chair at the Hudson Institute, Washington DC; Dr Charles Edel, former Senior Fellow at the US Studies Centre; Dr John Lee, Non-Resident Senior Fellow at the US Studies Centre, and Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute, Washington DC; and Dr Lavina Lee, Senior Lecturer at Macquarie University. Catch more analysis on the United States on the USSC YouTube channel. Manage your email preferences | Forward this email to a friend United States Studies Centre |