No images? Click here 19 JanuaryOne year on, what's changed?Tomorrow marks one complete year of the Biden administration, which is as good a time as ever to look back on how the administration has fared so far. Before assuming office on 20 January 2021, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris said they had five immediate priorities: COVID-19, racial equity, climate change, immigration and the economy. The Biden administration proudly points to 63 per cent of Americans being vaccinated, redoubled efforts addressing voter suppression and climate change, the passing of economic stimulus measures which saw US child poverty decrease by nearly 30 per cent and more jobs added in the first year of this administration than any prior. Critics, on the other hand, point out more Americans died from COVID-19 in 2021 than in 2020, the path forward for civil rights and environmental legislation looks uncertain at best, many of the Trump administration’s immigration restrictions remain in place, and inflation and supply chain concerns have Americans far more pessimistic about the economy in 2022 than they were when the Biden administration began. Biden’s approval rating has fallen close to the record lows recorded by Trump at the same stage of his presidency. Meanwhile, Republicans look increasingly likely to regain control of the US House of Representatives, and possibly the Senate too, in November’s midterm elections. Trump’s hold over the GOP is as strong as ever. The 2024 Republican presidential nomination appears to be Trump’s for the taking. Across the United States, numerous Republican-controlled state legislatures are passing laws that purport to help secure elections, but are making voter registration and turnout more burdensome, with effects widely expected to fall disproportionately on Democratic voters. We’ll be discussing all this in our first webinar of the year tomorrow: What to expect in politics and policy in 2022. In addition to a survey of where US politics is going in 2022, we will also examine what lies ahead on policy matters of vital importance to Australian national interests, including US defence spending, the nomination of Caroline Kennedy as Ambassador to Australia and progress on implementing AUKUS. We hope you can join us. Sincerely, NEWS WRAPThinking ahead
![]() We are going to debate voting rights. We are going to debate it, and, in the Senate, you know we need 60 votes to break a Republican filibuster ... but since we only have 50 Democrats in our razor-thin majority, the only path forward on this important issue is to change the rules to bypass the filibuster WEBINAR | 20 January 2022 What to expect in US politics and policy in 2022On the one-year anniversary of President Biden’s inauguration, experts from the United States Studies Centre will give their take on what to expect in US politics and policy in 2022. President Biden’s supporters posit that, in passing the American Rescue Plan Act and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, he has already accomplished more first-year legislative wins than any president in generations. Yet amid questions of competence following the chaotic Afghanistan withdrawal, inflation rates the highest in decades, the prospect of the most significant changes in abortion law in nearly half a century, and ever-worsening poll numbers potentially foreshadowing a GOP takeover in the midterms, President Biden and the Democrats are undeniably on the defensive. What are the issues likely to dominate US politics and the midterm elections in 2022? What comes of the Biden administration’s policy agenda if Republicans take back control of Congress? What issues should Australians keep an eye on? To discuss these issues, please join us for a webinar discussion with USSC politics experts, Senior Lecturer in US Politics and Foreign Policy Dr Gorana Grgic, Non-Resident Senior Fellow Bruce Wolpe and Senior Research Fellow Jared Mondschein in conversation with CEO Professor Simon Jackman. WHEN: COST: You can also subscribe to have event invitations and reminders sent straight to your inbox, so you never have to miss an event! ANALYSISCaroline Kennedy brings White House closerStephen Loosley,
AM It was prime minister Bob Menzies who told president Lyndon B. Johnson bluntly but accurately what the simple requirement happened to be for an effective US ambassador to Australia. The ambassador had to have the ability, Menzies told LBJ, to pick up the phone and talk directly to the US president. After all, under the US system, ambassadors represent their presidents and serve at their discretion. LBJ understood Menzies’ advice. His chosen ambassador to Australia was one Texan, Ed Clark, known colloquially within the Austin political establishment as “Mr Ed”. The Australian media tended to regard Clark as something of a yokel. After all, didn’t the folksy ambassador turn up at the opening of Pine Gap carrying one peppercorn to pay the annual rent? But Clark was very significant in LBJ’s political universe and more than once he had literally carried the bag of campaign cash for Johnson during his congressional and presidential campaigns. He enjoyed the president’s absolute confidence. This had been tested during one campaign where the future ambassador left his briefcase under the table in a remote Texas roadhouse in the early hours of the morning. Returning to the road, Clark realised his mistake and frantically drove back to find the briefcase intact. It contained $50,000. Australia has been well served by US ambassadors in Canberra... But the main current problem for the US diplomatic service is the appallingly slow process by which nominees are confirmed or rejected by the US Senate. Delaying tactics are practised by both sides of the aisle in Washington, but it has assumed disturbing proportions of late as Senator Ted Cruz (Rep-TX) holds up nominations until he can strike a deal on an issue of concern to him. At the end of last year, some 30-odd nominees were released from Senate gridlock after majority leader Senator Chuck Schumer (Dem-NY) agreed to bring to a vote Cruz’s opposition to the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia to Germany. In Washington DC, it is sometimes called the Molotov-Ribbentrop pipeline to register maximum distaste. But Cruz won the point. It’s appalling at a time when the United States is required to demonstrate greater political and diplomatic leadership its Senate treats the appointment of its representatives abroad with such cavalier disdain. Such capricious indulgence is a stain upon Washington DC. These are excerpts from an article published by The Australian. BY THE NUMBERSCOVID peaking in NY and NSW? Health experts in both New York and New South Wales are cautiously optimistic that Omicron cases appear to be peaking based on the number of test results returning positive cases. Last week New South Wales recorded a seven-day average of 32 per cent of positive tests - the highest percentage throughout the pandemic. New York's latest outbreak looks to be slowing with the highest seven-day average rate of positive tests recorded on 5 January at 22 per cent, the highest percentage seen since 2020 in the state. Read more By the numbers analysis here VIDEOA conversation with author David KilcullenIn June 2020, the United States Studies Centre hosted a webinar event featuring Dr David Kilcullen, author of The Dragons and the Snakes: How the Rest Learned to Fight the West, in discussion with USSC CEO Prof Simon Jackman. Dr Kilcullen shared his perspective that the risk of organised, civil violence in the United States was far more widespread and potentially more dangerous than commonly thought, especially in the lead up to the 2020 Presidential election. The January 6 insurrection would surely prove him right six months later. You can watch the webinar with Dr Kilcullen here, and catch more analysis on the United States on the USSC YouTube channel. Manage your email preferences | Forward this email to a friend United States Studies Centre |