No images? Click here 16 FebruaryBiden vs Trump: Indo-Pacific strategiesThe Biden administration has released its highly-anticipated Indo-Pacific Strategy – coinciding with Secretary of State Blinken’s tour around the Indo-Pacific. As former United States Studies Centre Non-Resident Senior Fellow Dr Charles Edel predicted in his preview of the strategy, the Biden administration’s approach shares the same emphasis on a “free and open Indo-Pacific” as the Trump administration’s strategy, but, unlike the Trump approach, does so by “speaking softly and carrying a bigger multilateral stick.” Key similarities between the Trump and Biden Indo-Pacific strategies include:
While many goals remain the same, there are stark differences between the two strategies. ![]() NEWS WRAPDiplomacy, diplomacy, diplomacy
![]() Back in December ... I set out the United States’ vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific, which – more than any other region – will shape the trajectory of the 21st century WEBINAR | 1 March Preview of Biden's first State of the Union AddressThe US Constitution mandates the president “shall from time to time give Congress information of the State of the Union”, which has now become an annual address from the sitting president. This is an opportunity for the president to make their case – celebrating successes so far and setting the policy trajectory for the year ahead. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi invited President Biden to give his first State of the Union Address on 1 March 2022. Facing dwindling poll numbers and an acrimoniously divided country, can President Biden’s address win him much needed political capital ahead of the November 2022 midterm elections? How much will the Indo-Pacific or other foreign policy feature in his address? What should Australia listen out for? To discuss these issues, please join us before President Biden’s address for a webinar event with USSC politics experts Associate Professor in American Politics and Foreign Policy David Smith, Non-Resident Senior Fellow Bruce Wolpe and Research Associate Victoria Cooper in conversation with CEO Professor Simon Jackman. WHEN: COST: You can also subscribe to have event invitations and reminders sent straight to your inbox, so you never have to miss an event! ANALYSISUS Indo-Pacific power depends on restraint in UkraineAshley Townshend As US Secretary of State Antony Blinken visits Australia this week for a Quadrilateral Security Dialogue foreign ministers’ meeting, his message will be that Washington can walk and chew gum at the same time. Amid escalating US-Russian tensions over the standoff in Ukraine, the Biden administration is eager to convince its Indo-Pacific allies and partners that it is still focused on their part of the world. But Washington’s top diplomat may find himself stuck in a vice. In Canberra, New Delhi, Tokyo, and key Southeast Asian capitals, there are growing concerns that the crisis in Ukraine is distracting the Biden administration from Indo-Pacific challenges and could embroil the overstretched superpower in yet another long engagement. Back in the United States and parts of Europe, however, prominent voices are calling on the administration to show greater “strength” against Russia, both in support of Ukraine and as a signal of US resolve to the rest of the world. These dynamics pull in very different directions. To safeguard the United States’ credibility and strategic position in the Indo-Pacific, the Biden team must continue to act with restraint over Ukraine. This doesn’t mean abandoning Kyiv, ignoring NATO’s security concerns, or looking the other way from the invasion of a sovereign country. But it does mean keeping the Ukraine crisis in a global strategic perspective—and addressing it in a disciplined way that preserves finite attention and resources for Washington’s “priority theater.” This is an excerpt from an article published by Foreign Policy BY THE NUMBERSOntario truckers halt US$2B goods As the United States biggest trading partner in 2021, it is estimated that the seven-day blockade of the Ambassador Bridge between Ontario and Detroit halted over US$2 billion worth of goods crossing between the two countries. An estimated 30 per cent of annual trade between Canada and the United States crosses the Ambassador Bridge with 10,000 trucks crossing daily carrying US$325 million in goods. Read more By the numbers analysis here VIDEOWhat can the Cold War teach us about strategic competition? A conversation with historian Hal BrandsDid you miss last weeks webinar? The USSC was joined by historian Hal Brands in conversation with USSC Senior Lecturer Dr Gorana Grgic to discuss his new book, The Twilight Struggle: What the Cold War Teaches Us about Great Power Rivalry Today. Catch more analysis on the United States on the USSC YouTube channel. Manage your email preferences | Forward this email to a friend United States Studies Centre |