|
No images? Click here 22 July 2026 Less than a month after the memorandum of understanding to end the Iran war was signed, hostilities again broke out between the United States and Iran. In the past week, three American service members were killed by Iranian missile and drone strikes in the region. On 7 July, President Trump wrote to Congress to inform them that fighting resumed, starting the clock on a new 60-day window for military activity that is not subject to congressional approval. While Iran and the United States have traded fire almost every day since then, US actions indicate a level of restraint that may be keeping the door open to further diplomacy. The rhetoric from the Trump administration is toned down from the height of the war when President Trump posted that “a whole civilisation will die tonight.” Now he is focused on getting back to negotiations, saying, “We're going to knock out all their bridges unless they get to the table and negotiate.” Another key aspect is the scope — the US efforts are more tightly focused on the Strait of Hormuz. They began attacking again after US forces said Iran was attacking ships in the Strait of Hormuz. Even as Iran has struck sites across the region, particularly US-linked facilities in the region, the US response has largely stayed on the strait. However, this may be shifting as President Trump announced US forces would strike Pickaxe Mountain “pretty soon”, where it is believed Iran moved many of its nuclear centrifuges. As with many aspects of the war, this stage between ceasefire and full-scale war has been a moveable feast. As USSC Research Director Jared Mondschein told ABC News, the current US fighting seems to signal a new status quo that is neither full-scale war nor peace; however, this will face the looming reality of midterm elections in the United States. Congressional decisions to either prolong or end the war (or a failure to do either) will implicate each of the roughly 400 members of Congress who are running for re-election in November. President Trump has said the midterms “won’t have any impact on me” and won’t change his plans in Iran, but as even more Republicans openly break with Trump, it will be a factor in deciding votes and the make-up of the next Congress. Lead image: Workers clean up wreckage around a damaged bridge, following US airstrikes carried out a day earlier, on 17 July 2026 in the southern Hormozgan Province, Iran. "We're not finished at all, but if we left right now, it would take them a long time, years, years, to rebuild."Recent content
In the newsSBS | What happens next in the Strait of Hormuz could set a dangerous precedentUSSC Associate Professor in American Politics and Foreign Policy David Smith spoke with SBS News about the next stage of the Iran war and said, "The original issue about Iran's nuclear program now just seems completely remote." 9 News | US President Donald Trump is claiming presidential election interference, this time taking aim at ChinaNon-Resident Senior Fellow Bruce Wolpe spoke with the Today Show about President Trump's national address and allegations about China's interference in US elections. Sky News | ‘Unclear’ whether SAVE America Act is 'advantageous' to Trump administrationUSSC Honorary Associate Dr Harry Melkonian spoke with Sky News about the SAVE America Act following President Trump's national address. He said it was unclear whether it would benefit Republicans and highlighted the "broader issue of starting to meddle in how states conduct elections." ABC | US disapproval of Iran war 'almost immediate' compared to other warsUSSC Director of Research Jared Mondschein spoke with ABC News, explaining how unpopular the Iran war is with the American public and across the political divide. He says the Trump administration continues to shift its justification for the war, signalling that an 'off-ramp' for an end to hostilities is unlikely anytime soon. Upcoming eventsSEMINARPublic health, Science and trust in the Trump eraIn this public seminar co-hosted by the University of Sydney Law School, Sydney Infectious Diseases and the United States Studies Centre, Professor Lawrence Gostin, Distinguished University Professor at Georgetown University, will review the impact of the second Trump administration’s policies on public health in the United States, and on global health. Following his keynote presentation, Professor Gostin will be joined by a panel of two eminent Australian public health experts, Professor Julie Leask AO, and Professor Andrew Wilson AO, to discuss the implications of the US retreat from global health for Australia. How vulnerable is Australia to loss of trust in our own public health institutions, and in science itself? Are falling vaccination rates a symptom of this? What can be done? USSC CEO Dr Michael Green will moderate the discussion and the seminar will feature opportunities for Q&A with the audience. DATE AND TIME22 July 2026 WHERESydney Law School, Law Foyer (Level 2 - street level entrance), New Law Building F10, University of Sydney DETAILSFree, but registration is essential CONFERENCESydney International Strategy Forum 2026From the Iran War to energy markets and Chinese ballistic missile tests in the Pacific, 2026 has been a year marked by disruption and disorder. In its 75th year, the ANZUS Treaty remains a source of stability enhanced by strengthened ties among like-minded partners across the Indo-Pacific. Yet questions are also growing about the trajectory of American power, Chinese intentions towards Taiwan, the impact of the trans-Atlantic rift, and the growing weaponisation of economic interdependence. Will ANZUS and the alliances in the Indo-Pacific be overwhelmed by this disorder or stand as a collective breakwater? Join us to analyse, debate and interpret these dynamics in real time with leading experts from the United States, Australia and the Indo-Pacific at the 4th annual Sydney International Strategy Forum. Confirmed speakers include:
DATE AND TIME23 September 2026 WHEREFour Seasons Hotel, Sydney DETAILSEarly Bird Rate (Until 31 July 2026): $799
Manage your email preferences | Forward this email to a friend United States Studies Centre |