Happy Sunday − and welcome to the best of The Conversation U.S. Here are a few of our recently published stories:

Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban: 5 essential reads on the case and its consequences
David Lynch exposed the rot at the heart of American culture

News of wars, polarizing politics and other sharp divisions sometimes makes it seem like humans don't agree about much. But there's at least one thing almost everyone seems to see eye to eye about: losing one is very costly.

That's right, across space, time and legal cultures, people tend to agree about the value of body parts, according to Yunsuh Nike Wee and Daniel Sznycer of Oklahoma State University and Jaimie Arona Krems of the University of California, Los Angeles. In one of last week's most popular stories, the three psychologists describe their new study, which shows that laws about bodily damage are rooted in something universal about human nature. The laws they studied range from "an eye for an eye" to workers' compensation.

They also conducted a survey of more than 600 people in India and the U.S. on the value of different body parts. "Our findings were striking," they write. "The more highly American laypeople tended to value a given body part, the more valuable this body part seemed also to Indian laypeople, to American, Korean and Emirati lawmakers" and even English and Swedish legal codes from the Middle Ages.

I don't want to give it all away, so if you want to know which body parts were consistently given the highest values, check out the fascinating story.

Bryan Keogh

Managing Editor

Readers' picks

An eye for an eye: People agree about the values of body parts across cultures and eras

Yunsuh Nike Wee, Oklahoma State University; Daniel Sznycer, Oklahoma State University; Jaimie Arona Krems, University of California, Los Angeles

People from many different cultures across the globe and across millennia largely agree about which body parts are most valuable – and how much compensation they warrant when injured.

Wildfires can contaminate drinking water systems with harmful chemicals − here’s what Los Angeles needs to know

Andrew J. Whelton, Purdue University

Fires can make drinking water, and the water pipes and tanks themselves, unsafe. A researcher who has worked with communities after several wildfires explains why, and what to do.

Is capitalism falling out of favor? We analyzed 400,000 news stories to find out

Jay L. Zagorsky, Boston University; H. Sami Karaca, Boston University

The death of capitalism has been greatly exaggerated.

The power of friendship: How a letter helped create an American bestseller about antisemitism

Rachel Gordan, University of Florida

‘Gentleman’s Agreement,’ a novel by Laura Z. Hobson, was considered groundbreaking for its depiction of everyday prejudice.

One way Trump could help revive rural America’s economies

Tim O'Brien, Harvard Kennedy School; Tim Freeman, Harvard Kennedy School

Many small towns rely on one major industry and can face long-term existential shocks if that industry fails. Biden’s attempt to reposition rural economies for the future missed a crucial factor.

Editors' picks

Rents rise faster after disasters, but a federal program can help restrain excesses

Anthony W. Orlando, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

A scholar who researches how rents increase after disasters is fearful for his own community as he watches it burn and braces for the aftermath.

Gaza ceasefire and hostage deal: Why now and what next?

Asher Kaufman, University of Notre Dame

Three-phased deal will start with the release of 33 hostages held by Hamas since Oct. 7, 2023. If fully implemented, the agreement will see the withdrawal of Israeli troops from the Palestinian enclave.

Biden helped bring science out of the lab and into the community − emphasizing research focused on solutions

Arthur Daemmrich, Arizona State University

Biden’s legacy includes elevating science’s influence in federal decision-making and considering the social and ethical effects of research.

Mass deportations don’t keep out ‘bad genes’ − they use scientific racism to justify biased immigration policies

Shoumita Dasgupta, Boston University

The US has a long history of misusing genetics and biology in immigration policy, the effects of which are still keenly felt today.

When presidents would send handwritten lists of their nominees to the Senate, things were a lot different

Peter Kastor, Washington University in St. Louis

The US now faces the likelihood of a bruising and raucous set of confirmation hearings − a clear break from the cooperative system the founders established.

News Quiz 🧠