In a chilling hour-long presentation yesterday, the leaders of a public inquiry confirmed who was to blame for the fire that consumed Grenfell Tower in west London in 2017. Chairman Sir Martin Moore-Bick detailed the many mundane and craven decisions that were made about insulation, cladding and regulatory compliance that combined to produce a building that ended up killing 72 of its own residents in the most horrible circumstances.

In the wake of the report, Richard Hull, a specialist in chemistry and fire science, reveals that construction companies were under no requirement to report on the toxicity of the materials they were using in their buildings. And now we have had it confirmed: it is this toxicity that killed the victims. He writes here about his efforts to build an evidence base to make sure this deadly loophole is closed.

The report is a long one but its findings are of huge importance. So we asked an expert to take us through the key findings. They are set out here.

Following elections in Germany over the weekend that saw the anti-Ukraine far right and far left make unprecedented gains, we’ve also been looking at why so many people in the former Soviet bloc are still sticking with the Kremlin.

And our series defending unpopular animals continues here with a look at a common garden visitor.

Laura Hood

Senior Politics Editor, Assistant Editor

A firefighter investigates following the fire in Grenfell tower in 2017. Alamy/PA/Rick Findler

Grenfell victims were ‘overcome by toxic gases’ – this is the deadly construction loophole that helped cause their deaths

Richard Hull, University of Central Lancashire

Manufacturers have to provide information on the fire behaviour of construction products, but there is no requirement to quantify the toxicity of the smoke.

Vibrant Pictures/Alamy Stock Photo

Grenfell Tower report: an expert explains why so many people have been blamed

Paresh Wankhade, Edge Hill University

The inquiry accused companies of misleading the market to make cladding products seem safer than they were known to be.

German protesters with placards supporting a closer relationship with Russia and calling for no more tanks for Ukraine. icholas Muller/S/Alamy

Pro-Putin movement expands across the former Soviet bloc – here’s why

Stefan Wolff, University of Birmingham

East Germans are not the only former members of the Soviet bloc who are moving closer to Putin’s position on the Ukraine war.

World

Politics + Society

Arts + Culture

Education

Environment

Health

Science + Technology

From the archive

Grenfell should have been a wake-up call – but the UK still doesn’t take fire safety seriously because of who is most at risk

Shane Ewen, Leeds Beckett University

Fire is a social equality issue. Amid fresh concerns over rogue landlords and dangerous overcrowding, why have calls for change gone unheeded for so long?

More newsletters from The Conversation for you:

Ukraine Recap • Imagine climate action • Gaza Update • Global Economy & Business • Europe newsletter • Something Good

About The Conversation

We're a nonprofit news organisation dedicated to helping academic experts share ideas with the public. We can give away our articles thanks to the help of universities and readers like you.

Donate now to support research-based journalism

 
 
 
 
 
 

Featured events

View all
Revolution Plastics PhD Conference

3 - 4 September 2024 • Portsmouth

Particulate Gravity Currents Conference

9 - 11 September 2024 • Hull

Promote your event
 

Contact us here to have your event listed.

For sponsorship opportunities, email us here