There are trials that grab public attention – and then there is the unprecedented trial of former U.S. President Donald Trump that begins in a New York City courtroom next week. That trial promises to be the focus of massive news coverage across the globe.

How should we cover such an over-covered event? That was the question the politics team grappled with over the last month. How can we provide information that the public doesn’t know already?

We settled on four stories. First was a story by political scientist and legal scholar Paul Collins, from UMass Amherst, who wrote about Trump’s attacks on the trial judge and his daughter from the perspective of how they affected democracy. The attacks, Collins wrote, are the latest in Trump’s “long effort to undermine the rule of law. The attacks demonstrate his efforts to appear to play by the rules, but in reality to violate the norm of respect for the judiciary that previous presidents have followed, even when they disagreed with court decisions.”

Next, Harvard criminal law expert Ronald S. Sullivan Jr. asked, and answered, the question, “Given all the news coverage of Trump’s legal woes and antics, just how does the court select a fair and impartial jury?” Sullivan digs into what he calls a “popular misconception,” that an impartial juror doesn’t know anything about the case. “That is inaccurate,” writes Sullivan.

Tomorrow, we have an interview with two scholars, Tim Bakken, a former prosecutor and now a scholar of law at West Point, and Karrin Vasby Anderson, an expert on political communication at Colorado State. Usually, when I do an interview, I ask a lot of questions. In this case, the conversation between the two about the charges against Trump and his authoritarian rhetoric about being a political victim was so good I just got out of the way and let them talk.

And on Monday morning, just before the trial begins, you’ll be able to read University of Texas journalism scholar Mary Angela Bock’s look at what will be happening behind the scenes as journalists and photographers gather. “Photojournalists will likely work from cordoned-off pens in the Manhattan Criminal Courthouse, and if their scrums are anything like the others I’ve studied over time, they’ll gather very early, stake claim to key spots and spend far more time waiting than recording video,” she writes.

Also in this week’s politics news:

[Get fact-based journalism written by experts in your inbox each morning, Monday - Saturday.]

Naomi Schalit

Senior Editor, Politics + Democracy

Donald Trump picks his targets carefully and seeks to undermine their legitimacy. AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Trump pushes the limits of every restriction he faces – including threatening judges and their families

Paul M. Collins Jr., UMass Amherst

Trump’s efforts may appear to play by the rules, but in reality they ignore key aspects of the rule of law because he does not act in good faith.

A recent survey shows that at least 70% of people in the U.S. believe the country is on the wrong track. Malte Mueller/ fStop/Getty Images

Talking to Americans reveals the diversity behind the shared opinion ‘the country is on the wrong track’

Dante Chinni, Michigan State University; Ari Pinkus, Michigan State University

For at least 50 years, pollsters have been asking Americans whether they think their country is on the right or wrong track. That question may have outlived its usefulness.

President Joe Biden greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in New York City in September 2023. Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

Biden steps up pressure on Israel − using the key levers available against an ally with strong domestic support

Jordan Tama, American University School of International Service

Israel has historically made statements and taken actions to placate US anger without always following through. But will Biden’s threat to put conditions on aid force Israel to behave differently?

Are embassies off-limits? Ecuadorian and Israeli actions suggest otherwise − and that sets a dangerous diplomatic precedent

Jorge Heine, Boston University

The bombing of the Iranian consulate in Damascus and storming of Mexico’s embassy in Quito breaks with accepted diplomatic norms − and could spell trouble.

Rwandan genocide, 30 years on: Omitting women’s memories encourages incomplete understanding of violence

Anneliese M. Schenk-Day, The Ohio State University

Rwanda is touted as one of the leading nations when it comes to strides toward gender equality. But the role of female ‘rescuers’ in the 1994 genocide is being downplayed.

Yes, efforts to eliminate DEI programs are rooted in racism

Tatishe Nteta, UMass Amherst; Adam Eichen, UMass Amherst; Douglas Rice, UMass Amherst; Jesse Rhodes, UMass Amherst; Justin H. Gross, UMass Amherst

There’s a backlash against programs that aim to reverse the effects of systemic racism in the US. A survey indicates that racism is behind that backlash.

From Reagan to Obama, presidents have left office with ‘strategic regret’ − will leaving troops in Iraq and Syria be Biden or Trump’s?

Charles Walldorf, Wake Forest University

President Reagan said sending troops to Lebanon was his ‘greatest regret.’ Other presidents left office with similar misgivings. Could leaving troops in Syria and Iraq be the next strategic mistake?