Happy Sunday − and welcome to the best of The Conversation U.S. Here are a few of our recently published stories:
• What does Israel’s strike mean for US policy on Iran and prospects for a nuclear deal?
• The forcible removal of Sen. Alex Padilla signals a dangerous shift in American democracy
The U.S. health care system has long been derided as complex, bloated and more about profits than keeping people healthy. Indeed, even though the U.S. spends more per capita on health care than any country in the world, it ranks at or near the bottom among developed nations on a host of measures, including access, outcomes and life expectancy. And while perspectives may differ, I have found broad agreement among friends and family across the political spectrum that the system is broken and needs fixing.
But the system’s many problems are largely by design, according to Zachary W. Schulz, a public health historian at Auburn University.
“My research and that of many others show that today’s high costs, deep inequities and fragmented care are predictable features developed from decades of policy choices that prioritized profit over people, entrenched racial and regional hierarchies, and treated health care as a commodity rather than a public good,” he writes in one of last week’s most popular stories with our readers.
Schulz traces the creation of today’s health care system to the emergence of employer-based insurance in the 1940s and explores how it has – and hasn’t – changed over the years into today’s system of complicated, costly deductibles, co-pays and a focus on procedures rather than prevention.
“Understanding what the U.S. health care system is designed to do – rather than assuming it is failing unintentionally – is a necessary first step toward considering meaningful change,” he writes.
|