Taking a selfie may seem like no big deal: Just aim your phone’s camera at your face and click the button. But taking a selfie so that a company can use facial recognition technology to verify your identity – in order to engage in a basic government service like paying your taxes – makes it a very big deal. That’s why news that the IRS is planning to require taxpayers who want to file online to create an account with a private facial recognition company called ID.me has sparked a backlash.

The process is simple – just upload a selfie along with a photo ID. And the IRS says it’s necessary to cut down on identity theft. But the experiences many people have had using the system at state agencies that already require it for accessing services like unemployment benefits is less than reassuring, according to James Hendler, who studies artificial intelligence and the use of data in government.

The computer scientist explores concerns about the cutting-edge technology, why government agencies are increasingly using it and whether ID.me will protect your data.

Also today:

Eric Smalley

Science + Technology Editor

Beginning this summer, you might need to upload a selfie and a photo ID to a private company, ID.me, if you want to file your taxes online. Oscar Wong/Moment via Getty Images

Government agencies are tapping a facial recognition company to prove you’re you – here’s why that raises concerns about privacy, accuracy and fairness

James Hendler, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Federal and state governments are turning to a facial recognition company to ensure that people accessing services are who they say they are. The move promises to cut down on fraud, but at what cost?

Environment + Energy

Ethics + Religion

Health + Medicine

Science + Technology

Politics + Society

From our international editions

Today's graphic

A chart showing the total herbicide use on US soybeans from 1992 to 2016. The chart shows what percentage of herbicide use is specifically glyphosate.

From the story, The herbicide dicamba was supposed to solve farmers’ weed problems – instead, it’s making farming harder for many of them

Like this newsletter? You might be interested in our weekly emails:

Enjoy reading The Conversation? Share us with your three closest friends:

About The Conversation:

We're a nonprofit news organization dedicated to helping academic experts share ideas with the public. We can give away our articles thanks to the help of foundations, universities and readers like you.

Donate now to support research-based journalism