If you’ve been following the latest innovations in artificial intelligence, you’ve probably come across a familiar script: reader beware – AI is out to steal your job.

Such headlines are reductive, to say the least. Certainly, some jobs – especially those that are repetitive and laborious – may be taken over by machines. But the general consensus among experts seems to be that we should prepare for disruption to the world of work, rather than a complete takeover.

But how do you know your job is safe? As Niusha Shafiabady writes, a good place to start is by looking at where you live. Amid all our conversations about how we can adapt to the advent of AI, we generally fail to mention that some countries are better placed to adapt than others.

Data on technological uptake across the world suggest developing nations could be hit hardest as AI pokes its head into all aspects of life.

These countries don’t have as much of the money, skills and resources required to transition effectively to the AI-driven age of work. And with their relatively large populations, any job losses due to AI are likely to create an ultra-competitive, employer-controlled workforce that certainly won’t favour the average worker.

For those of us fortunate enough to have jobs that require research and creativity, it might help to think of AI not as something that’s going to steal your job, but rather as an assistant who’s willing and eager to help. As Kai Riemer and Sandra Peter point out, chatbots are very good at composing text, but are prone to mistakes and failures of logic (or “hallucinations”, as they’re sometimes called when AI goes really awry). They suggest thinking of AI as like a super-keen grad student, whose work requires careful checking.

Here at The Conversation, we require our authors to disclose in full any time they use AI when writing, and not to use it at all for article research or generating ideas – we think that should be the sole preserve of our human experts.

Noor Gillani

Technology Editor

Whose job will AI replace? Here’s why a clerk in Ethiopia has more to fear than one in California

Niusha Shafiabady, Charles Darwin University

It’s likely developing countries will be hit the hardest as AI become more common and more affordable.

AI chatbots are coming to your workplace but are not necessarily coming for your job

Kai Riemer, University of Sydney; Sandra Peter, University of Sydney

Chatbots are proving to be productive and useful but they can be unreliable and make mistakes.

Is nuclear the answer to Australia’s climate crisis?

Reuben Finighan, The University of Melbourne

When Australia’s government and opposition argue over how to get to net zero emissions, nuclear power is the flashpoint. The argument against nuclear is stronger, but not for the obvious reason.

Grattan on Friday: Treasurer Jim Chalmers pumps up his role in energy transition

Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra

This is probably a good thing for the government, because the transition to renewables isn’t going as well as it needs to

The ‘drums of war’ are receding, but Anthony Albanese still faces many uncertainties on his trip to China

David S G Goodman, University of Sydney

There are limits around what Australia might hope to achieve and what it should expect in Beijing, but there is room for cooperation.

I was a geriatrician on Old People’s Home for Teenagers. Here’s why I joined this TV experiment

Stephanie Ward, UNSW Sydney

Could teenagers get on with older people and vice versa? Turned out, they could. And both flourished.

I was a ward of the state. The horrors of the Parramatta Girls’ Home were legendary

Jacqueline Z. Wilson, Australian Catholic University

Built in 1821 to house and provide productive employment for the New South Wales colony’s growing population of female convicts, the Parramatta Female Factory was also the site of countless horrors.

Friday essay: jilted lovers could once sue for breach of promise – did we lose something in abolishing this law?

Alecia Simmonds, University of Technology Sydney

Australians could once claim compensation for injuries arising from a broken engagement. Today, the responsibility for romantic injury has been individualised and feminised, its pain trivialised.

Taming wild northern rivers could harm marine fisheries and threaten endangered sawfish

Éva Plagányi, CSIRO; Laura Blamey, CSIRO; Michele Burford, Griffith University; Robert Kenyon, CSIRO

Any plan to dam or extract water from some of Australia’s last wild rivers must carefully consider the consequences. Prawn, mud crab and barramundi fisheries could suffer in the Gulf of Carpentaria.

Whakaari/White Island court case will change the level of accepted risk in NZ’s tourism industry

Freya Higgins-Desbiolles, University of South Australia; James Higham, Griffith University

Everyone involved in the tourism industry will need to manage risk differently after a court found the landowners of Whakaari/White Island guilty of breaching the Health and Safety at Work Act.

Politics + Society

Health + Medicine

 

Featured jobs

View all
List your job
 
 
 
 
 

Featured Events, Courses & Podcasts

View all
Life in Ancient Australia

7 November 2023 • Sandy Bay

Promote your event or course
 

​Contact us here to list your job, or here to list your event, course or podcast.

For sponsorship opportunities, email us here