Early Wednesday, the Israeli military said it had entered Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, where thousands of civilians are sheltering and conditions have deteriorated sharply in recent days, to carry out what it described as “a precise and targeted operation” against Hamas militants.

As the world watches on with increasing alarm, calls are growing louder for a ceasefire in a war that has already claimed the lives of more than 11,000 Palestinians and 1,200 Israelis.

At the White House this week, Indonesian President Joko Widodo said a “ceasefire is a must for the sake of humanity.”

But what exactly is a ceasefire, and why are they so difficult to agree on?

Marika Sosnowski, a University of Melbourne research fellow who studies ceasefires, explains that even getting two sides in a conflict to agree on the right terminology is a challenge. Some prefer “humanitarian pauses” to a “ceasefire”, while others prefer the term “truce”.

Instead of focusing so squarely on achieving an overall halt in fighting (whatever we want to call that), she says we can lose sight of other points of agreement that can save lives, such as how to allow aid convoys into an area.

Ceasefires can also be problematic, she writes, if they are agreed to without taking into account the long-term implications for civilians.

Given the suffering of civilians on both sides of the Israel-Hamas conflict, it is imperative some form of ceasefire happens, Sosnowski writes. But how we get there is still uncertain.

Justin Bergman

International Affairs Editor

What exactly is a ceasefire, and why is it so difficult to agree on one in Gaza?

Marika Sosnowski, The University of Melbourne

Virtually as old as conflict itself, a ceasefire is a way of formalising a halt to violence between warring parties. But ceasefires can come in many different forms, leading to disagreements.

The Optus outage shows us the perils of having vital networks in private hands

Helen Bird, Swinburne University of Technology

The Optus chief will face some tough questions about the company’s poor handling of last week’s catastrophic network outage when she appears before a Senate inquiry.

Infrastructure review recommends culling 82 planned projects

Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra

An independent review finds the projected cost of Australia’s $120 billion infrastructure pipeline has blown out by $32.8 billion.

Rishi Sunak’s decision to bring back David Cameron has distracted us all for now, but the long-term strategy is flawed

Christopher Byrne, University of Nottingham

Sunak recently attacked ‘30 years of the status quo’ and promptly appointed a man who governed for six of those years to his top team.

David Cameron: lessons from other ex-prime ministers who returned to government

Marc Collinson, Bangor University

Some former leaders provide a much needed steady hand. Others just steal the limelight.

Grok is Elon Musk’s new sassy, foul-mouthed AI. But who exactly is it made for?

Nataliya Ilyushina, RMIT University

The chatbot has been released to a small group of testers and some of X’s Premium+ subscribers – many of them have shared their initial thoughts.

Politics with Michelle Grattan: James Paterson on the High Court’s decision on detention and rising anti-Semitism

Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra

In this podcast, Liberal Senator James Paterson joins The Conversation to discuss the High Court's ruling, his concerns about rising anti-Semitism, rising cyber risks, and Australia's future relations with China

How could Australia actually get to net zero? Here’s how

Anna Skarbek, Climateworks Centre; Anna Malos, Monash University; Michael Li, Monash University

It’s still possible for Australia to cut emissions in line with holding climate change to 1.5°C. Here’s how.

We’re burning too much fossil fuel to fix by planting trees – making ‘net zero’ emissions impossible with offsets

Mike Joy, Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington

The idea that harm done today can be offset in the future is based on a basic misunderstanding of the carbon cycle. Planting more trees is important – but it’s no substitute for cutting emissions.

How a new identity-focused ideology has trapped the left and undermined social justice

Hugh Breakey, Griffith University

Is social justice advanced by focusing on people’s different identities? Or is this worldview ultimately a trap?

‘Phage therapy’ could treat some drug-resistant superbug infections, but comes with unique challenges

Christine Carson, The University of Western Australia; Lucy Furfaro, The University of Western Australia

Researchers are desperately seeking viable alternatives to antibiotics. So what is phage therapy? And how could it help?

Scrublands: not a whodunit but a ‘howcatchem’, a new suspenseful Aussie inversion of the genre

Stephen Gaunson, RMIT University

The new series on Stan is most successful through its links to rural crime noir, pulling apart the vulnerability and deception of this small town.

Politics + Society

Health + Medicine

Science + Technology

Environment + Energy

Business + Economy

  • We won’t get real equality until we price breastmilk, and treat breastfeeding as work

    Julie P. Smith, Australian National University; Catherine Pereira-Kotze, University of the Western Cape; Karleen Gribble, Western Sydney University

    The report of the Women’s Economic Equality Taskforce mentions birth only twice, and breastfeeding not at all. Yet, properly valued, breastmilk contributes $154 per litre to the Australian economy.

 

Featured jobs

View all
The Conversation AU
Melbourne VIC, Australia • Full Time
The Conversation AU
Melbourne VIC, Australia • Full Time
The Conversation AU
Melbourne VIC, Australia • Full Time
List your job
 
 
 
 
 

Featured Events, Courses & Podcasts

View all
Retrofit Symposium

21 - 22 November 2023 • Melbourne

Promote your event or course
 

​Contact us here to list your job, or here to list your event, course or podcast.

For sponsorship opportunities, email us here