Nau mai, haere mai.
It’s a quirk of fate that the all-important Rugby World Cup quarterfinal between the All Blacks and Ireland will kick off at 8.00am on the morning after the general election. It’s hard to say which result will matter most to more people, but at least a rugby game only lasts 80 minutes.
An election campaign, on the other hand, can seem to go on a very long time – perhaps especially so for an electorate that’s tired already from a pandemic and its after-effects, extreme weather events and the daily cost-of-living grind.
But to deploy the rugby analogy once again, it’s also been a campaign of two halves. As Richard Shaw writes today, what looked for a while like a relatively predictable contest has become in the final weeks and days a panicky affair about uncertain outcomes, potential “chaos”, and the spectre of a second election.
Behind the politicking and jostling for power, Shaw points out, there are longer-term trends at work: declining voter turnout and a steady drift away from the two major parties. On current polling, roughly one in three voters will choose a party other than Labour or National.
The extraordinary single-party majority won by Jacinda Ardern’s Labour in 2020, driven by COVID and her own brand of charisma, was surely an exception. Like it or not, we are back to close elections and unpredictable outcomes.
“Yet,” writes Shaw, “this is what MMP was intended to do: to blunt the ability of a single political party (generally elected with a minority of the vote) to impose its policy agenda, and to reflect – in the composition of both parliament and the government – our increasingly fluid voting behaviour and changing demography.”
Mā te wā – and don't forget to vote!
|