After President Trump deployed Marines and National Guard troops to quell immigration protests in Los Angeles, California Gov. Gavin Newsom called the move a show of “authoritarianism.”
Newsom’s reference is appropriate, argues U.S. history scholar Justin Randolph of Texas A&M University. He points out that the last time a president federalized troops over a governor’s objection dates to the Civil Rights Movement, when Black Americans stood up against the authoritarianism of Southern governors and their militarized National Guard troops. In those cases, however, presidents protected people with federal troops, whereas Trump has federalized troops to protect the government from protesters.
Trump’s view of law enforcement, Randolph argues, mirrors the militarized authority that some Southern governors cemented under Jim Crow policing. Arkansas Gov. Orville Faubus’ deployment of the National Guard to resist the desegregation of Little Rock Central High School offers one example. Other instances would follow with the desegregation of interstate transportation in the South, when political leaders used the National Guard in some cases to maintain segregation and preserve the interests of racial authoritarians.
The Los Angeles protesters, Randolph writes, reflect the continued struggle for social change. Their work may be criticized as “rebellion” by the Trump administration, but it follows a long American tradition of fighting authoritarianism.
Also in this week’s politics news:
|
The National Guard and protesters stand off outside of a downtown jail in Los Angeles on June 8, 2025.
Spencer Platt/Getty Images
Justin Randolph, Texas A&M University
During Jim Crow segregation, political leaders used domestic military power to preserve the interests of racial authoritarians.
|
Protesters parade through the Marigny neighborhood of New Orleans as part of the nationwide No Kings protest against President Donald Trump, on June 14, 2025.
Patt Little/Anadolu via Getty Images
Jeremy Pressman, University of Connecticut
Protests can serve two opposing purposes. They can represent a mass movement in favor of democracy – and simultaneously serve a nascent dictator in their efforts to undermine democracy.
|
U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla of California is pushed out of the room after he interrupted Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a news conference in Los Angeles on June 12, 2025.
David Crane/MediaNews Group/Los Angeles Daily News via Getty Images
Charlie Hunt, Boise State University
A combination of factors, including Democrats and Republicans feeling more and more animosity for the other side, led to the roughing up of Sen. Alex Padilla at a press conference.
|
|
Jeffrey Fields, USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences
Some of the major events in US-Iran relations highlight the differences between the countries’ views, but others presented real opportunities for reconciliation.
| |
Stephen Legomsky, Washington University in St. Louis
What would the United States be without its states? A better, more democatic country, says one legal scholar.
|
Alex Hinton, Rutgers University - Newark
The lone wolf metaphor used to describe mass shooters misinforms views of extremists – and hampers law enforcement efforts to deter the violence.
| |
Claire B. Wofford, College of Charleston
Can the president fire leaders of more than 50 independent agencies overseen by Congress because he wants to? The Supreme Court may say yes, upending decades of constitutional law.
|
|
|