Since we launched our audience has grown more than ten-fold, from 15m in our first 12 months to 175 million at the peak in 2020. It’s always gratifying to hear from some of these of readers.

When we launched the campaign last week a new donor wrote to say: “Thank you for all that you do. I love The Conversation for its topical, non-partisan, research-based articles.”

Our research-based articles today include an examination of the different views of two leading US climate scientists, how the oil and gas industry has lobbied delegates at COP28 to influence discussions, and a look at a study that suggests, counterintuitively, that exercise doesn't have any effect on longevity.

Newsletter subscribers have written in too. One spoke of how The Conversation’s articles provided an important baseline of facts in a world of spin: “It's a pleasure to read neutral, well-written and well-researched journalism (with full transparency for sources and references). It's refreshing and much-needed at a time when it's becoming increasingly worrying to observe the rise of partisan and unreliable reporting in the British media.”

And sometimes a supporter gives us some insight into their lives which underscores why what The Conversation does is important. Referring to the pandemic, the donor writes: "I was so very frightened at the start due to my health, my granddaughter was pregnant and my grandson had just been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Your truthful articles helped me find the right balance between being scared, being careful, and living. Thank you to everyone at The Conversation for their hard work."

Our editors work with leading experts to offer their research insights, carefully presented and made clear for our readers to learn from. Comments like this remind us why we do what we do, and that we're on the right track.

Thank you for reading. If you value our work, please consider making a donation today.

Jo Adetunji

Editor

Vladi333/Shutterstock

The disagreement between two climate scientists that will decide our future

Robert Chris, The Open University; Hugh Hunt, University of Cambridge

Is reaching net zero emissions by 2050 enough to halt warming? One leading scientist says no.

Sadi-Santos/Shutterstock

From the Paris agreement to COP28, how oil and gas giants try to influence the global climate agenda

Alain Naef, ESSEC

Many oil and gas companies support a tax on carbon, even though they are significant emitters.

BGStock72/Shutterstock

Does exercise really do nothing for longevity, as a Finnish twins study suggests?

George M. Savva, Quadram Institute

We should not rule out a direct link between exercise and longevity, but it may have a smaller role than previously thought.

Politics + Society

Arts + Culture

Business + Economy

Environment

Health

Science + Technology

More newsletters from The Conversation for you:

Ukraine Recap • Imagine climate action • Gaza Update • Global Economy & Business • Europe newsletter • Something Good

About The Conversation

We're a nonprofit news organisation dedicated to helping academic experts share ideas with the public. We can give away our articles thanks to the help of universities and readers like you.

Donate now to support research-based journalism

 

Featured events

View all
Accelerating Just Climate Action Conference

12 December 2023 • Manchester

The 7th Geography of Innovation Conference

10 - 12 January 2024 • Manchester

Promote your event
 

Contact us here to have your event listed.

For sponsorship opportunities, email us here