Happy Sunday − and welcome to the best of The Conversation U.S. Here are a few of our recently published stories:
Regular readers of our Sunday newsletter know I reference “The West Wing” a lot – and real-world events frequently remind me of episodes of the TV show. Most recently, Sen. Cory Booker’s record 25-hour speech last week made me recall the episode in which a fictional senator from Minnesota, Howard Stackhouse, performs a similar gambit of talking nonstop for as long as possible in order to prevent a health bill from passing without funding for autism research.
Booker’s speech wasn’t about a specific bill but more broadly about raising concerns about President Donald Trump’s overall approach to government. He declared: “I rise tonight because silence at this moment of national crisis would be a betrayal of some of the greatest heroes of our nation.”
“Although Booker’s speech was not technically a filibuster,” writes Charlie Hunt, an assistant professor of political Science at Boise State University, “it was clearly a monumental physical achievement.”
While Booker’s oration was a major feat and set a record, beating out Sen. Strom Thurmond’s 1957 speech by almost an hour, did it also serve any other meaningful purpose? Hunt dives into the history of long Senate speeches, the arcane rules and what they tell us about their impact.
On “The West Wing,” in any case, the filibuster worked: Stackhouse got his funding after the White House staff realized what he was trying to do.
|