|
Partners for Attainable Places
Partners for Vibrant Places
Partners for Lasting Places
KUA is excited to announce the upcoming relocation of our offices to a larger space at 33 Georgia Ave. We designed this new building as part of the overall redevelopment for Carter several years ago, so this will be a rewarding move into a space we have a strong connection to. While we’re thrilled about the new digs, we expect a
transition period as we adjust. But walking and biking to work will stay a core focus of KUA, and we’re already looking forward to the Little Tart Bakeshop location just a block away. See you there!
CURRENT KEY PROJECTS
CLIENT: Westside Future Fund
Westside Future Fund (WFF) is an Atlanta-based nonprofit working to ensure that those who live, work, and learn in the city’s historic Westside can stay and thrive in the community they love. Guided by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s vision of the Beloved Community, WFF leads holistic neighborhood restoration focused on housing, education, safety, and economic opportunity.
In support of WFF’s mission, KU+A provided high-density, mixed-use redevelopment, offering greater affordability rates for current and future Westside residents.
839 BOONE BOULEVARD
SERVICES PROVIDED:
Main Street Redevelopment, Housing Choices
SIZE: 33 units, 1,200 sq ft retail
The site was comprised of five vacant parcels facing Joseph E. Boone Blvd. Development of this site took advantage of the proximity to the newly constructed Kathryn Johnston Memorial Park and an underdeveloped commercial corridor. The site’s transit proximity positions it to be a transit-oriented development that does not heavily rely on cars. The project created four three-story multifamily buildings and a micro-retail commercial building. The multifamily buildings are designed as a mix of plexes. The project includes a total of 33 one-, two-, and three-bedroom units and offers a workforce, for-rent product.
646 ECHO ST, NW
SERVICES PROVIDED:
Development Guidance, Architecture, Housing Choices
SIZE: 24 units, 1,200 sq ft retailThis project is a missing-middle, workforce housing residential development effort in the English Avenue neighborhood and offers a for-rent product.
It includes 24 total housing units across two 12-plex buildings. As a community amenity, the site has a shared community green, accessible to all residents. The shared outdoor space will be used for play, informal gathering, and underground stormwater treatment.
Housing MismatchOver the years, we’ve crafted a housing inventory ranging from 250 SF studios to 12-unit missing middle plexes, with an eye towards promoting gentle density in communities constrained by restrictive zoning codes. These units form the building blocks of better neighborhoods and underpin our efforts to engage community leaders, developers, and other design professionals in addressing the U.S. housing
crisis.
THE CHALLENGES
The United States is suffering from a housing mismatch, attributable to both restrictive zoning codes and transformative demographic shifts. Many areas have an oversupply of large, single-family houses and an insufficient supply of other housing forms, such as smaller single-family homes or compact walk-up apartment buildings that fit into existing residential fabric.
Zoning rules influence the type of housing that gets built.Today, more than 80% of American households are not traditional nuclear families (U.S. Census Bureau). Instead, households increasingly consist of those headed by single parents, couples without children, roommates, and individuals who live alone. Over time, homes have grown significantly larger. This trend is often attributed to builder greed, but the reality is more complicated. Builders respond to the regulatory environment that shapes the market. When zoning regulations allow only one house per lot, the financial incentive becomes clear: build the largest house possible. Larger homes help cover the fixed cost of land and maximize the value of the single unit allowed.
This is what has led to the housing mismatch – housing that neither matches nor meets the needs of today’s households.
THOUGHT LEADERSHIP "Housing costs are crazy. So are transportation costs. That’s why legalizing more housing next to transit is so important. Full stop." Eric Kronberg
TRANSIT VS. MOBILITYTransit versus mobility - what’s the difference?Many cities have transit systems of various stripes. Legalizing more housing types near stops and stations is a crucial way to provide more people with
meaningful transit access. It also provides more financial support for the transit system through increased ridership. But what happens when towns lack any form of public transit? In areas originally developed before 1929, walking was typically intended as a primary means of mobility. These are often the blocks directly adjacent to the main street. They feature sidewalks and street trees to facilitate coming and going on foot or on a bicycle. These neighborhoods frequently include on-street parking, providing more efficient vehicle storage. We call these areas Mobility Rich Places. They offer the chance for locals to make trips that do not require a car. For example, you can grab dinner with your family, have a drink with a friend, and ideally pick up a few essentials without being required to drive across town. Mobility Rich Places also benefit significantly from increased housing choices.
OTHER TOPICS YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
OUR 2026 HOUSING CHOICE CATALOG IS NOW AVAILABLE!
A TOOLKIT FOR DELIVERING FLOURISHING, ATTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
Housing Choice is an anchoring principle for KUA, overlapping the broader goals of our multidisciplinary practice. Accessible to development professionals and anyone interested in creating better communities, our new 2026 Housing Choice Catalog highlights our housing inventory, ranging from 250 SF studios to 12-unit missing middle plexes. This catalog is a cultivated inventory of tested, thoughtful housing designs that serve as building blocks to better neighborhoods. These housing infill options help to support our goal of creating vibrant, inclusive, and attainable neighborhoods by broadening the spectrum of housing choices for everyone.
Rounding out the specialty programming at #CNU34 on Tuesday, The Congress for the New Urbanism is hosting a full day of workshopping for builders and real estate developers, folks we know play such a critical role in implementing walkable, vibrant communities!
During the congress, Eric will be speaking on the following panels:
Tired of Waiting? City as Developer
Tuesday, May 12 / 10:00 am - Eric Kronberg
- Rebekah Kik
- Tim Corcoran
Incremental Development: Training, Codes, Coalition
Thursday, May 14 / 2:30 pm- Alli Thurmond Quinlan
- Eric Kronberg
- Elizabeth Ward Williams
Re-Regulating for Attainability
Tuesday, May 12 / 12:15 pm - Eric Kronberg
- Elizabeth Ward WIlliams
Streamlining Housing Development with Pre-Approved Plans
Thursday, May 14 / 4:00 pm- Alli Thurmond Quinlan
- Eric Kronberg
- Christina Carlson
Get ready for Build Maine June 2-3, 2026
185 Water Street Skowhegan, Maine
Eric will present:
Re-Regulating for QUALITY Housing Abundance
Eric will share an expansive compendium of strategies for increasing the supply of housing. His presentation will cover how to identify, break down, and solve problems that are holding back communities from being socially vibrant and economically productive.
AHA Action Hour: Why Housing Reform Matters
At the heart of the conversation are a few simple questions. We believe the answer to all of these questions is “yes!”
Should the people who serve our communities—teachers, firefighters, nurses, and service workers—be able to afford to live
in the places they support? Should seniors be able to downsize in the same neighborhoods they helped build? Should young adults have a realistic chance of owning a home before the age of 40, now the median age of a first-time homebuyer in the United States (National Association of Realtors)? Should more of our daily trips be possible on foot or by
bike rather than by car?
Atlanta is synonymous with civil rights, traffic, and, lately, lack of affordability. With the top 20% of residents earning, on average, over $350,000, and the bottom 20% of residents earning, on average, $11,000 in 2024, Atlanta has officially solidified itself as the U.S. city with the highest income inequality for multiple years in a row (GOBanking Rates). The average required annual income needed to buy a home for the median price of $369,400 in the Atlanta Metro Area was $114,301 in Q1 of 2025 (State of The Nation’s Housing 2025, Joint Center For Housing Studies Harvard University). The reasons behind Atlanta's complex relationship with inequality are multi-faceted, but this blog focuses on the large role that land use and zoning play in exacerbating existing inequities.
|