From BJA and Global No images? Click here Criminal Intelligence Coordinating CouncilJune 28, 2024 To better serve you and provide the most informative content related to public safety and intelligence, please email “Five in 5” recommendations for posting to the editor at fivein5@iir.com. IACP ArticleA Training Approach to Use-of-Force InvestigationsAuthored by the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), this article presents a more efficient way of investigating police use-of-force incidents. The article suggests shifting focus to proficiency-based training, policy, and practices rooted in the Graham standard of objective reasonableness, and utilization of in-house SMEs in all or part of the use-of-force investigation process. The study purports that after switching to this method, agencies will likely find that officers are more confident and are making sound and defendable decisions with properly applied force options. Thus, agencies will achieve the desired results with decreased liability based on the establishment of sound practices. The study found that positive results from this shift in practice were seen almost immediately in the agencies utilizing the recommended methodology. COPS ReportLaw Enforcement Solutions by the Field, for the Field: Collaborative Reform Sixth Annual ReviewPublished by the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office), this report highlights the Collaborative Reform Initiative Technical Assistance Center (CRI-TAC)’s sixth year of operations. This report demonstrates how the center has supported law enforcement agencies in their efforts to promote public safety in their communities. It includes performance metrics, case studies, and testimonials on the delivery of “by the field, for the field” assistance to state, county, local, campus, tribal, and territorial agencies. JCH WebinarCrime Scene Documentation for First RespondersHosted by the Justice Clearinghouse (JCH), this webinar will focus on important aspects and situations of crime scene investigation that first responders may be called upon to document the crime scene as they arrive. In many circumstances, conditions and evidence may change or be lost, and the initial responders may be able to help preserve the conditions of the scene upon arrival, thereby assisting the entire investigation. In this webinar, techniques and methods that can be used to aid in these preservation efforts will be discussed. Date: Thursday, July 11, 2024 NW3C CourseFC203 Financial Investigations: Beyond the BasicsDeveloped by the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C), this course presents the fundamentals of financial investigations and incorporates some of the more advanced processes that elevate an investigation. During this course, attendees will learn about investigative processes, practical tools, and sources of information necessary to plan and conduct financial investigations. The course begins with a description of the basic composition of elements within illicit financial networks and how they work to compromise legitimate business and financial sectors. Course material will describe government, regulatory, and investigative actions within the United States and by international partners to detect and investigate illicit actors and networks. The course also includes considerations for investigation planning and promoting creative thinking. Date: Tuesday, July 9 ̶ Thursday, July 11, 2024 NIJ ArticleReducing Gun Violence Through Integrated Forensic Evidence Collection, Analysis, and SharingReleased by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), this article explores recent research on a comprehensive gun violence reduction strategy that was implemented statewide in New Jersey. New Jersey created a multipronged approach of data integration, collaboration, and intelligence-led policing that has helped reduce gun violence, enhanced investigations, and resulted in new leads in New Jersey. The key was sharing and analyzing information across forensic, criminal intelligence, and investigative entities at all levels of government—local, state, and federal—to support violent crime suppression. This article evaluates New Jersey’s gun violence reduction strategy by documenting the state’s process of collection, integration, and analysis of firearms, ballistics, crime gun tracing, and intelligence data and the impact of that effort on violent crimes. Did a colleague share this email with you? Click the link to become a subscriber. The Criminal Intelligence Coordinating Council’s (CICC) Five in 5 is a collection of resources that may be of interest to law enforcement and homeland security partners working to improve the nation’s ability to develop and share criminal intelligence. The Five in 5 highlights promising practices, case studies, and success stories and identifies products, reports, training, and toolkits to build, implement, and enhance a criminal intelligence capability. You are encouraged to share this e-mail with your association members, colleagues, department/organization personnel, and others, as appropriate. To view the Five in 5 archive, visit: https://it.ojp.gov/FiveIn5. The mission of the CICC is to advocate for and support state, local, and tribal law enforcement and homeland security agencies and personnel in their efforts to develop and share criminal intelligence for the promotion of public safety and the security of our nation. This publication is funded in whole or in part through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this publication (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided). This project was supported by Grant No. 2018-DP-BX-K021 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Justice’s Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office of Victims of Crime. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. |