|
No images? Click here Published by the Bolch Judicial Institute of Duke Law June 2026 • Judicature International Hi Friend, Welcome to the refreshed look of Judicature International: a streamlined format focused on developments shaping courts and the rule of law globally. This month’s issue examines a recent U.S. advisory opinion addressing when judges may speak publicly — and when they should not — in an increasingly complex media environment. The opinion was also a focal point of a recent Bolch Judicial Institute seminar, part of our ongoing reporting on how courts are navigating these pressures. We are interested in how courts around the world are approaching similar questions. If your court has developed guidance or practices in response to criticism, misinformation, or threats to judicial independence, please share! — Michelle Kaminsky As public criticism of courts intensifies around the world, judges face a difficult question: When — and how — should they speak publicly in defense of judicial independence, the rule of law, or colleagues under attack? A recent U.S. advisory opinion offers a framework. It affirms that judges may speak, write, and engage in civic education on core issues and, in some circumstances, defend colleagues facing illegitimate attacks. But it also draws clear limits: Judges must avoid commenting on pending cases, engaging in partisan politics, or undermining public confidence in their impartiality. Where is the line — and how should judges navigate it?
Global Judicial News: |