From BJA and Global No images? Click here Criminal Intelligence Coordinating CouncilJune 7, 2024 To better serve you and provide the most informative content related to public safety and intelligence, please email “Five in 5” recommendations for posting to the editor at fivein5@iir.com. NIJ ArticleU.S. Law Enforcement Officers’ Stress, Job Satisfaction, Job Performance, and Resilience: A National SamplePublished by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), this article presents the results of a national study examining job stress, job satisfaction, job performance, and resilience among law enforcement officers in the United States. The study found that stress was negatively related to job satisfaction for officers who had easy access to agency-based wellness programs, whether they had concerns about stigma or used the programs or not. The association between stress and job performance varied according to program access, use, and concerns about stigma associated with use. Administrators and policymakers striving to retain a high-performance police workforce may consider these results in recruiting as well as in making academy and in-service wellness training and program decisions. NPI PublicationCan We Fix the “Crisis of Legitimacy” in American Policing?Written by the National Policing Institute (NPI), this essay examines previous reform concepts and their shortfalls. It explores how human behavior is heavily influenced by incentives and disincentives and whether a strong enough reward system is in place to truly move officers from the “warrior” to the “guardian” mentality. Finally, it examines what police leaders, government officials, and policing scholars will need to do to implement, successfully evaluate, and achieve lasting reform within the communities being served. The essay proposes that a reconstruction of the way police agencies evaluate their performance should be at the center of reform efforts. The essay states that rather than determining effectiveness exclusively through crime-fighting statistics, police agencies must also incorporate assessments of how community members are treated. Within this framework, the definition of “good policing” must be reimagined. According to the essay, evidence-based policing must acknowledge a large body of research on procedural justice and recognize the critical role it plays in determining police legitimacy to implement effective reform. Resource HighlightSafer Schools ClearinghouseFunded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance and released by the Student, Teachers, and Officers Preventing (STOP) School Violence Program , the Safer Schools Training and Technical Assistance Clearinghouse for Law Enforcement provides a one-stop shop for law enforcement and school safety professionals to access relevant training and technical assistance. The clearinghouse also features a comprehensive resource library that hosts publications, websites, trainings, webinars, videos, and podcasts aimed at addressing specific aspects related to enhancing school resource officer programs, school safety, and school climate. NW3C WebinarICAC—Do You Take Cash App?Hosted by the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C), this webinar is designed to teach attendees what might be available to them when they obtain records via search warrant or legal service. The webinar will explore how to take something as simple as a username on PayPal, Venmo, and Cash App and use it to identify the suspect of an investigation. A human-trafficking scenario will be explored in these open-source techniques that can be applied to any type of future investigation. Date: Thursday, June 13, 2024 CNA ReportSuicidality Among Domestic TerroristsReleased by the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA), this report was written to contribute to scholarship regarding suicidality in domestic terrorism. Using the Domestic Terrorism Offender Level Database (DTOLD), it explores whether domestic terrorism attacks may also be crimes of despair. The report found that domestic terrorists in general may be more suicidal than members of the general population but significantly less suicidal than mass shooters, except when domestic terrorists kill four or more people (notably, four is the number of deaths required for a shooting to meet the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s definition of a mass shooting). Did a colleague share this email with you? Click the link to become a subscriber. The Criminal Intelligence Coordinating Council’s (CICC) Five in 5 is a collection of resources that may be of interest to law enforcement and homeland security partners working to improve the nation’s ability to develop and share criminal intelligence. The Five in 5 highlights promising practices, case studies, and success stories and identifies products, reports, training, and toolkits to build, implement, and enhance a criminal intelligence capability. You are encouraged to share this e-mail with your association members, colleagues, department/organization personnel, and others, as appropriate. To view the Five in 5 archive, visit: https://it.ojp.gov/FiveIn5. The mission of the CICC is to advocate for and support state, local, and tribal law enforcement and homeland security agencies and personnel in their efforts to develop and share criminal intelligence for the promotion of public safety and the security of our nation. This publication is funded in whole or in part through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this publication (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided). This project was supported by Grant No. 2018-DP-BX-K021 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Justice’s Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office of Victims of Crime. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. |