By Philippa Stroud
It seems everyone is talking about social justice now. From Owen Smith making his pitch to Labour Party members, to Theresa May on the steps of Downing Street. In our topsy-turvy political world, a commitment to social justice seems to be the one thing everyone agrees on.
This superficial consensus hides a new fault line in our political language. When some speak of social justice they view it as financial redistribution through the welfare state. When others speak of social justice they view it as addressing the ‘root causes’ of poverty which repeat the cycle of poverty over and over again.
Our political class talk of little other than social justice because they understand that the EU referendum result exposed divisions even greater than the simple binary choice on the ballot paper.
This social unrest will continue to dominate our politics until the lives of those living in poverty and the uneven impact of globalisation and inter-generational poverty are addressed.
Opinion polling conducted following the referendum, asking people why they voted they way they did, points decisively to a wider feeling of isolation from an economy that simply doesn't work for those at the bottom and a political class that has become disconnected from the daily challenges facing low income voters.
As Theresa May said on the steps of Downing Street, "life is much harder than many people in Westminster realise". This is the real lesson of the referendum.
The biggest negotiation facing Theresa May will not be with EU leaders, but re-negotiating the conditions faced by those living in our poorest towns and villages.